198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12768139)
1. Comparative biomechanical analysis of a cervical cage made of an unsintered hydroxyapatite particle and poly-L-lactide composite in a cadaver model.
Totoribe K; Matsumoto M; Goel VK; Yang SJ; Tajima N; Shikinami Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 May; 28(10):1010-5; discussion 1015. PubMed ID: 12768139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.
Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical analysis of biodegradable interbody fusion cages augmented With poly(propylene glycol-co-fumaric acid).
Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Kleemann R; Duda G; Wise DL; Trantolo DJ; Lewandrowski KU
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Aug; 27(15):1644-51. PubMed ID: 12163726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bioabsorbable interbody cages in a sheep cervical spine fusion model.
Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Schnake KJ; Haas NP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Sep; 29(17):1845-55; discussion 1856. PubMed ID: 15534403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A biomechanical and histological evaluation of a bioresorbable lumbar interbody fusion cage.
Hojo Y; Kotani Y; Ito M; Abumi K; Kadosawa T; Shikinami Y; Minami A
Biomaterials; 2005 May; 26(15):2643-51. PubMed ID: 15585267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Schäfer J; Born C; Duda G; Haas NP; Mittlmeier T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(17):1850-7. PubMed ID: 11568693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Application of a stand-alone interbody fusion cage based on a novel porous TiO2/glass ceramic--2: Biomechanical evaluation after implantation in the sheep cervical spine].
Korinth MC; Hero T; Pandorf T; Zell D
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Apr; 50(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 15884708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro study.
Nayak AN; Stein MI; James CR; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Adu-Lartey M; Castellvi AE; Santoni BG
Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):3002-10. PubMed ID: 24948039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone interbody fusion cages in the cervical spine.
Shimamoto N; Cunningham BW; Dmitriev AE; Minami A; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Oct; 26(19):E432-6. PubMed ID: 11698902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
Pflugmacher R; Schleicher P; Gumnior S; Turan O; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Haas NP; Kandziora F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1717-22. PubMed ID: 15303013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Experimental fusion of the sheep cervical spine. Part II: Effect of growth factors and carrier systems on interbody fusion].
Kandziora F; Scholz M; Pflugmacher R; Krummrey G; Schollmeier G; Schmidmaier G; Schnake KJ; Duda G; Raschke M; Haas NP
Chirurg; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1025-38. PubMed ID: 12395162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of stiffness and failure load of two cervical spine fixation techniques in an in vitro human model.
Hart R; Gillard J; Prem S; Shea M; Kitchel S
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Feb; 18 Suppl():S115-8. PubMed ID: 15699796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques.
Scholz M; Schleicher P; Pabst S; Kandziora F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(7):E375-80. PubMed ID: 25584947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of cervical zero profile integrated cage with and without supplemental posterior Interfacet stabilization.
Havey RM; Blank KR; Khayatzadeh S; Muriuki MG; Pappu S; Patwardhan AG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Aug; 78():105078. PubMed ID: 32585556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can an Endplate-conformed Cervical Cage Provide a Better Biomechanical Environment than a Typical Non-conformed Cage?: A Finite Element Model and Cadaver Study.
Zhang F; Xu HC; Yin B; Xia XL; Ma XS; Wang HL; Yin J; Shao MH; Lyu FZ; Jiang JY
Orthop Surg; 2016 Aug; 8(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 27627721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages.
Nayak AN; Gutierrez S; Billys JB; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1331-8. PubMed ID: 23685215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.
Scholz M; Reyes PM; Schleicher P; Sawa AG; Baek S; Kandziora F; Marciano FF; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bioabsorbable interbody magnesium-polymer cage: degradation kinetics, biomechanical stiffness, and histological findings from an ovine cervical spine fusion model.
Daentzer D; Willbold E; Kalla K; Bartsch I; Masalha W; Hallbaum M; Hurschler C; Kauth T; Kaltbeitzel D; Hopmann C; Welke B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(20):E1220-7. PubMed ID: 25010099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
