These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
46. Contrast-agent phase effects: an experimental system for analysis of susceptibility, concentration, and bolus input function kinetics. Akbudak E; Norberg RE; Conturo TE Magn Reson Med; 1997 Dec; 38(6):990-1002. PubMed ID: 9402201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Measurement of arterial input functions for dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging using echoplanar images: comparison of physical simulations with in vivo results. Duhamel G; Schlaug G; Alsop DC Magn Reson Med; 2006 Mar; 55(3):514-23. PubMed ID: 16463343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Phantom-Less Nonlinear Magnetic Resonance Imaging Calibration With Multiple Input Blood Flow Model. Saka T; Gotoh T; Kagei S; Iwasawa T; Takimoto RY; Tsuzuki MSG Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Feb; 32(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 36735623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Modeling tissues contrast agent concentration: a solution to the tissue homogeneity model using a simulated arterial input function. Kuikka JT Magn Reson Med; 2001 Oct; 46(4):837-9. PubMed ID: 11590663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Structural and practical identifiability of contrast transport models for DCE-MRI. Conte M; Woodall RT; Gutova M; Chen BT; Shiroishi MS; Brown CE; Munson JM; Rockne RC PLoS Comput Biol; 2024 May; 20(5):e1012106. PubMed ID: 38748755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. DSC MRI in the human brain using deoxyhemoglobin and gadolinium-Simulations and validations at 3T. Schulman JB; Sayin ES; Manalac A; Poublanc J; Sobczyk O; Duffin J; Fisher JA; Mikulis D; Uludağ K Front Neuroimaging; 2023; 2():1048652. PubMed ID: 37554650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Facile One-Pot Green Synthesis of Magneto-Luminescent Bimetallic Nanocomposites with Potential as Dual Imaging Agent. Ostruszka R; Půlpánová D; Pluháček T; Tomanec O; Novák P; Jirák D; Šišková K Nanomaterials (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36985921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters. Mazaheri Y; Kim N; Lakhman Y; Jafari R; Vargas A; Otazo R NMR Biomed; 2022 Jul; 35(7):e4718. PubMed ID: 35226774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Size and density measurements of single sickle red blood cells using microfluidic magnetic levitation. Goreke U; Bode A; Yaman S; Gurkan UA; Durmus NG Lab Chip; 2022 Feb; 22(4):683-696. PubMed ID: 35094036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Dependency of R van Dorth D; Venugopal K; Poot DHJ; Hirschler L; de Bresser J; Smits M; Hernandez-Tamames JA; Debacker CS; van Osch MJP NMR Biomed; 2022 May; 35(5):e4653. PubMed ID: 34816501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Non-Invasive Evaluation of Cerebral Microvasculature Using Pre-Clinical MRI: Principles, Advantages and Limitations. Callewaert B; Jones EAV; Himmelreich U; Gsell W Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34064194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Dynamic contrast-enhanced QSM for perfusion imaging: a systematic comparison of ΔR2*- and QSM-based contrast agent concentration time curves in blood and tissue. Lind E; Knutsson L; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R MAGMA; 2020 Oct; 33(5):663-676. PubMed ID: 32078074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]