BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12768785)

  • 1. [Mechanism of esophageal speech after total laryngectomy].
    Xu W; Han D; Hou L; Zhang L; Wang S; Huang Z; Yu Z
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Feb; 37(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 12768785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [How good is the esophageal voice?].
    Brusis T; Schöning A
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Nov; 63(11):585-8. PubMed ID: 6521588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavior of the cricopharyngeal segment during esophageal phonation in laryngectomized patients.
    Aguiar-Ricz L; Dantas RO; Ricz H; Gielow I; Mamede RC; Perdoná GC
    J Voice; 2007 Mar; 21(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 16504467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A long-term observation of 48 cases of tracheoesophageal shunt phonation by the anastomosis of the membranous portion of the tracheal section with the anterior wall of esophagus after total laryngectomy].
    Shang Y; Zhou Y; Tao Z; Wu Y; Tang X; Li Q
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Feb; 37(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 12768784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech, with an emphasis on the voiced-voiceless distinction.
    Jongmans P; Hilgers FJ; Pols LC; van As-Brooks CJ
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):172-81. PubMed ID: 17114130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The voice and speech quality in laryngectomy patients rehabilitated with second generation voice prosthesis].
    Kosztyła-Hojna B; Rogowski M; Łuczaj J; Kasperuk J
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Sep; 25(147):230-5. PubMed ID: 19112837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative evaluation of the voice prosthesis after laryngectomy].
    Kischk BT; Gross M
    HNO; 1995 May; 43(5):304-10. PubMed ID: 7607916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative acoustic analysis of voice production by near-total laryngectomy and normal laryngeal speakers.
    Hoasjoe DK; Martin GF; Doyle PC; Wong FS
    J Otolaryngol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 1564748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the effects of primary myotomy in total laryngectomy on the neoglottis with the use of quantitative videofluoroscopy.
    Op de Coul BM; van den Hoogen FJ; van As CJ; Marres HA; Joosten FB; Manni JJ; Hilgers FJ
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Sep; 129(9):1000-5. PubMed ID: 12975276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic analysis of the voiced-voiceless distinction in Dutch tracheoesophageal speech.
    Jongmans P; Wempe TG; van Tinteren H; Hilgers FJ; Pols LC; van As-Brooks CJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Apr; 53(2):284-97. PubMed ID: 20360458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual evaluation and acoustic analysis of pneumatic artificial larynx.
    Xu JJ; Chen X; Lu MP; Qiao MZ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Dec; 141(6):776-80. PubMed ID: 19932853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vocal efficiency in tracheoesophageal phonation.
    Grolman W; Eerenstein SE; Tange RA; Canu G; Bogaardt H; Dijkhuis JP; Dreschler WA; Schouwenburg PF
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2008 Mar; 35(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 17959326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The evaluation of voice quality after near-total laryngectomy].
    Ozüdoğru E; Cakli H; Sekili H; Cingi E; Keçik C; Gürbüz MK; Bal C
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2004; 12(3-4):71-7. PubMed ID: 16010104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive value of objective esophageal insufflation testing for acquisition of tracheoesophageal speech.
    Callaway E; Truelson JM; Wolf GT; Thomas-Kincaid L; Cannon S
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Jun; 102(6):704-8. PubMed ID: 1602920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analysis of comparison between different kinds of alaryngeal speech in laryngectomized patients with euphonic speech].
    Kosztyła-Hojna B; Rogowski M; Kasperuk J; Moskal D; Rutkowski R; Falkowski D
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2010 Apr; 28(166):277-83. PubMed ID: 20491337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Voice rehabilitation with Provox2 voice prosthesis following total laryngectomy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Terada T; Saeki N; Toh K; Uwa N; Sagawa K; Takayasu S; Sakagami M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2007 Mar; 34(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 17137738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Pharyngoesophageal Segment After Total Laryngectomy.
    Arenaz Búa B; Olsson R; Westin U; Rydell R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2017 Feb; 126(2):138-145. PubMed ID: 27932525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multidimensional assessment of female tracheoesophageal prosthetic speech.
    Kazi R; Kiverniti E; Prasad V; Venkitaraman R; Nutting CM; Clarke P; Rhys-Evans P; Harrington KJ
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 31(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 17184457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voice and speech after laryngectomy.
    Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Musura M; Globlek D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16428237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between tracheoesophageal voice and speech and intraluminal pharyngoesophageal transition pressure.
    Takeshita TK; Zozolotto HC; Ricz H; Dantas RO; Aguiar-Ricz L
    Pro Fono; 2010; 22(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 21271104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.