These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12768785)

  • 1. [Mechanism of esophageal speech after total laryngectomy].
    Xu W; Han D; Hou L; Zhang L; Wang S; Huang Z; Yu Z
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Feb; 37(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 12768785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [How good is the esophageal voice?].
    Brusis T; Schöning A
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Nov; 63(11):585-8. PubMed ID: 6521588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavior of the cricopharyngeal segment during esophageal phonation in laryngectomized patients.
    Aguiar-Ricz L; Dantas RO; Ricz H; Gielow I; Mamede RC; Perdoná GC
    J Voice; 2007 Mar; 21(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 16504467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A long-term observation of 48 cases of tracheoesophageal shunt phonation by the anastomosis of the membranous portion of the tracheal section with the anterior wall of esophagus after total laryngectomy].
    Shang Y; Zhou Y; Tao Z; Wu Y; Tang X; Li Q
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Feb; 37(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 12768784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech, with an emphasis on the voiced-voiceless distinction.
    Jongmans P; Hilgers FJ; Pols LC; van As-Brooks CJ
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):172-81. PubMed ID: 17114130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The voice and speech quality in laryngectomy patients rehabilitated with second generation voice prosthesis].
    Kosztyła-Hojna B; Rogowski M; Łuczaj J; Kasperuk J
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Sep; 25(147):230-5. PubMed ID: 19112837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative evaluation of the voice prosthesis after laryngectomy].
    Kischk BT; Gross M
    HNO; 1995 May; 43(5):304-10. PubMed ID: 7607916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative acoustic analysis of voice production by near-total laryngectomy and normal laryngeal speakers.
    Hoasjoe DK; Martin GF; Doyle PC; Wong FS
    J Otolaryngol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 1564748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the effects of primary myotomy in total laryngectomy on the neoglottis with the use of quantitative videofluoroscopy.
    Op de Coul BM; van den Hoogen FJ; van As CJ; Marres HA; Joosten FB; Manni JJ; Hilgers FJ
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Sep; 129(9):1000-5. PubMed ID: 12975276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic analysis of the voiced-voiceless distinction in Dutch tracheoesophageal speech.
    Jongmans P; Wempe TG; van Tinteren H; Hilgers FJ; Pols LC; van As-Brooks CJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Apr; 53(2):284-97. PubMed ID: 20360458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual evaluation and acoustic analysis of pneumatic artificial larynx.
    Xu JJ; Chen X; Lu MP; Qiao MZ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Dec; 141(6):776-80. PubMed ID: 19932853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vocal efficiency in tracheoesophageal phonation.
    Grolman W; Eerenstein SE; Tange RA; Canu G; Bogaardt H; Dijkhuis JP; Dreschler WA; Schouwenburg PF
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2008 Mar; 35(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 17959326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The evaluation of voice quality after near-total laryngectomy].
    Ozüdoğru E; Cakli H; Sekili H; Cingi E; Keçik C; Gürbüz MK; Bal C
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2004; 12(3-4):71-7. PubMed ID: 16010104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive value of objective esophageal insufflation testing for acquisition of tracheoesophageal speech.
    Callaway E; Truelson JM; Wolf GT; Thomas-Kincaid L; Cannon S
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Jun; 102(6):704-8. PubMed ID: 1602920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analysis of comparison between different kinds of alaryngeal speech in laryngectomized patients with euphonic speech].
    Kosztyła-Hojna B; Rogowski M; Kasperuk J; Moskal D; Rutkowski R; Falkowski D
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2010 Apr; 28(166):277-83. PubMed ID: 20491337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Voice rehabilitation with Provox2 voice prosthesis following total laryngectomy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Terada T; Saeki N; Toh K; Uwa N; Sagawa K; Takayasu S; Sakagami M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2007 Mar; 34(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 17137738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Pharyngoesophageal Segment After Total Laryngectomy.
    Arenaz Búa B; Olsson R; Westin U; Rydell R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2017 Feb; 126(2):138-145. PubMed ID: 27932525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multidimensional assessment of female tracheoesophageal prosthetic speech.
    Kazi R; Kiverniti E; Prasad V; Venkitaraman R; Nutting CM; Clarke P; Rhys-Evans P; Harrington KJ
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 31(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 17184457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voice and speech after laryngectomy.
    Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Musura M; Globlek D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16428237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between tracheoesophageal voice and speech and intraluminal pharyngoesophageal transition pressure.
    Takeshita TK; Zozolotto HC; Ricz H; Dantas RO; Aguiar-Ricz L
    Pro Fono; 2010; 22(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 21271104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.