207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12769138)
1. The potential synergy between cognitive models and modern psychometric models.
Bjorner JB; Ware JE; Kosinski M
Qual Life Res; 2003 May; 12(3):261-74. PubMed ID: 12769138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cognitive aspects of survey methodology and quality of life assessment.
McColl E; Meadows K; Barofsky I
Qual Life Res; 2003 May; 12(3):217-8. PubMed ID: 12769133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cognitive psychology and self-reports: models and methods.
Jobe JB
Qual Life Res; 2003 May; 12(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 12769134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods.
Collins D
Qual Life Res; 2003 May; 12(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 12769135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cognitive approaches to summary measurement: its application to the measurement of diversity in health-related quality of life assessments.
Barofsky I
Qual Life Res; 2003 May; 12(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 12769137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Establishing the HLS-Q12 short version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire: latent trait analyses applying Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.
Finbråten HS; Wilde-Larsson B; Nordström G; Pettersen KS; Trollvik A; Guttersrud Ø
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 18(1):506. PubMed ID: 29954382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.
Ballesteros J; Moral E; Brieva L; Ruiz-Beato E; Prefasi D; Maurino J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 28431587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
Meredith W; Teresi JA
Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: A review and tutorial.
Böckenholt U; Meiser T
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):159-181. PubMed ID: 28130934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of psychometric properties and differential item functioning of 8-item Child Perceptions Questionnaires using item response theory.
Yau DT; Wong MC; Lam KF; McGrath C
BMC Public Health; 2015 Aug; 15():792. PubMed ID: 26286333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a 12-item short version of the HIV stigma scale.
Reinius M; Wettergren L; Wiklander M; Svedhem V; Ekström AM; Eriksson LE
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 May; 15(1):115. PubMed ID: 28558805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Item response theory analysis applied to the Spanish version of the Personal Outcomes Scale.
Guàrdia-Olmos J; Carbó-Carreté M; Peró-Cebollero M; Giné C
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2017 Nov; 61(11):1021-1033. PubMed ID: 28833804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cognitive functions, their development and modern diagnostic methods].
Klasik A; Janas-Kozik M; Krupka-Matuszczyk I; Augustyniak E
Przegl Lek; 2006; 63 Suppl 1():29-34. PubMed ID: 17471820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linking self-perceived cognitive functioning questionnaires using item response theory: The subjective cognitive decline initiative.
Rabin LA; Sikkes SAM; Tommet D; Jones RN; Crane PK; Elbulok-Charcape MM; Dubbelman MA; Koscik R; Amariglio RE; Buckley RF; Boada M; Chételat G; Dubois B; Ellis KA; Gifford KA; Jefferson AL; Jessen F; Johnson S; Katz MJ; Lipton RB; Luck T; Margioti E; Maruff P; Molinuevo JL; Perrotin A; Petersen RC; Rami L; Reisberg B; Rentz DM; Riedel-Heller SG; Risacher SL; Rodriguez-Gomez O; Sachdev PS; Saykin AJ; Scarmeas N; Smart C; Snitz BE; Sperling RA; Taler V; van der Flier WM; van Harten AC; Wagner M; Wolfsgruber S; ; ;
Neuropsychology; 2023 May; 37(4):463-499. PubMed ID: 37276136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QoL) and the adjusted DSWAL-QoL (aDSWAL-QoL) using item analysis with the Rasch model: a pilot study.
Simpelaere IS; Van Nuffelen G; De Bodt M; Vanderwegen J; Hansen T
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):66. PubMed ID: 28388899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The will-to-live scale: development, validation, and significance for elderly people.
Carmel S
Aging Ment Health; 2017 Mar; 21(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 26323250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Translation and psychometric properties of the King's Sarcoidosis Questionnaire (KSQ) in German language.
Farin E; Heyduck K; Frye BC; Birring SS; Müller-Quernheim J; Schupp JC
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Apr; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 30975148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychometric evaluation of an item bank for computerized adaptive testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30 cognitive functioning dimension in cancer patients.
Dirven L; Groenvold M; Taphoorn MJB; Conroy T; Tomaszewski KA; Young T; Petersen MA;
Qual Life Res; 2017 Nov; 26(11):2919-2929. PubMed ID: 28707048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL Ability to Participate and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities item banks and short forms.
Heinemann AW; Kisala PA; Hahn EA; Tulsky DS
J Spinal Cord Med; 2015 May; 38(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 26010974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring the quality of life of people at the end of life: The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised.
Cohen SR; Sawatzky R; Russell LB; Shahidi J; Heyland DK; Gadermann AM
Palliat Med; 2017 Feb; 31(2):120-129. PubMed ID: 27412257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
