165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12770813)
1. [Metaplasia and high grade CIN. Diagnostic difficulties. Gynécol Obstét Fertil 2002; 30: 845-849].
Boulanger JC; Sevestre H
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 Mar; 31(3):316; author reply 319-20. PubMed ID: 12770813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Metaplasia and high grade CIN. Diagnostic difficulties. Gynécol Obstét Fertil 2002; 30: 845-849].
Monsonego J
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 Mar; 31(3):317-8; author reply 319-20. PubMed ID: 12770814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Metaplasia and high grade CIN. Diagnostic difficulties. Gynécol Obstét Fertil 2002; 30: 845-849].
Bergeron C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 Mar; 31(3):318-9; author reply 319-20. PubMed ID: 12770815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Metaplasia and high grade CIN. Diagnostic difficulties].
Tranbaloc P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2002 Nov; 30(11):845-9. PubMed ID: 12476688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of High-Grade Histopathology Diagnosed by Cervical Conization in Endocervical Curettage Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 1: A Case-Control Study.
Cong Q; Xiao J; Tao X; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jul; 24(3):247-251. PubMed ID: 32324695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Non-invasive lesions of the cervical glands. Apropos of a study of 431 conization specimens].
Chadli-Debbiche A; Philippe E; Ritter J; Baldauf JJ; Badre L; Bretz-Grenier MF; Rivasi F
Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1997; 45(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 9338998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Diagnostic approaches of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia].
Yang SL; Kong WM; Wu YM; Duan W; Zhu L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 48(5):344-7. PubMed ID: 24016476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early cervical neoplasia confirmed by conization: diagnostic accuracy of cytology, colposcopy and punch biopsy.
Matsuura Y; Kawagoe T; Toki N; Sugihara K; Kashimura M
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 8629405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ASCUS diagnoses.
Frankel KA
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):271-2. PubMed ID: 9479351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Semiology of cervical glandular cell abnormalities].
Di Bonito L
Ann Pathol; 2011 Nov; 31(5 Suppl):S105-6. PubMed ID: 22054441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cervical conization in dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. Role of concomitant uterine curettage].
Kazadi Buanga J; Acosta Vazquez MJ
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1994 Dec; 89(12):602-5. PubMed ID: 7846467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study of organizer nucleolar regions by the argyrophil technique in cervical intraepithelial neoplasias.
Calore EE; Maeda MY; Cavaliere MJ; Pereira SM; Shih LW; Pereira GM; de Melo JR
Minerva Ginecol; 1997 Mar; 49(3):59-62. PubMed ID: 9099054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is it possible to define a better ASCUS class in cervicovaginal screening? A review of 187 cases.
Guerrini L; Sama D; Visani M; Cotignoli T; Sintoni C; Maioli P; Lanzanova G; Schincaglia P
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 11480714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Epithelioid Glomus Tumor of the Uterine Cervix: A Case Report and Review.
Aynardi JT; Kim SH; Barroeta JE
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2016 May; 35(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 26630229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytologic features of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions involving endocervical glands on thin-layer cytology.
Selvaggi SM
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):689-90. PubMed ID: 16450913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Re: Have we resolved how to triage equivocal cervical cytology?
Arbyn M; Dillner J; Van Ranst M; Buntinx F; Martin-Hirsch P; Paraskevaidis E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Sep; 96(18):1401-2; author reply 1402. PubMed ID: 15367574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: is cervical conization necessary?
McCord ML; Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Ling FW
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 2014085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse.
Nam K; Chung S; Kwak J; Cha S; Kim J; Jeon S; Bae D
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Oct; 14(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 20885163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Osseous metaplasia of cervical epithelium.
Sabatini L; Rainey AJ; Tenuwara W; Webb JB
BJOG; 2001 Mar; 108(3):333-4. PubMed ID: 11281479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
