These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12770962)

  • 1. A comparison of perimetric results with the Medmont and Humphrey perimeters.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jun; 87(6):690-4. PubMed ID: 12770962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of visual field sensitivities between the Medmont automated perimeter and the Humphrey field analyser.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham SL
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 38(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 20447123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Prospective randomized comparative study of frequency doubling perimetry vs standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma].
    Kampmeier J; Eisert B; Buchwald HJ; Lang GK; Lang GE
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Mar; 218(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 11322052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eye Movement Perimetry and Frequency Doubling Perimetry: clinical performance and patient preference during glaucoma screening.
    Meethal NSK; Pel JJM; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; George R
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 257(6):1277-1287. PubMed ID: 30944987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of global indices between the Medmont Automated Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 91(10):1285-7. PubMed ID: 17389740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyser and Humphrey Matrix Perimeter for the evaluation of glaucoma patients.
    Chen YH; Wu JN; Chen JT; Lu DW
    Ophthalmologica; 2008; 222(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 18781091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
    Delgado MF; Nguyen NT; Cox TA; Singh K; Lee DA; Dueker DK; Fechtner RD; Juzych MS; Lin SC; Netland PA; Pastor SA; Schuman JS; Samples JR;
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Dec; 109(12):2362-74. PubMed ID: 12466186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Topography of the frequency doubling perimetry visual field compared with that of short wavelength and achromatic automated perimetry visual fields.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16361671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma.
    Rao HL; Raveendran S; James V; Dasari S; Palakurthy M; Reddy HB; Pradhan ZS; Rao DA; Puttaiah NK; Devi S
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 27977480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Compass and Humphrey perimeters in detecting glaucomatous defects.
    Fogagnolo P; Modarelli A; Oddone F; Digiuni M; Montesano G; Orzalesi N; Rossetti L
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 26(6):598-606. PubMed ID: 27375066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the frequency doubling technology screening algorithm and the Humphrey 24-2 SITA-FAST in a large eye screening.
    Allen CS; Sponsel WE; Trigo Y; Dirks MS; Flynn WJ
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Feb; 30(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 11885802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SITA-Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression.
    Wall M; Johnson CA; Zamba KD
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 102(10):1396-1401. PubMed ID: 29331951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ability of Medmont M600 automated perimetry to detect threats to fixation.
    Zhang L; Drance SM; Douglas GR
    J Glaucoma; 1997 Aug; 6(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 9264306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the visual field test of Glaufield Lite with Humphrey Field Analyser.
    Behera G; Waghmare SV; Ramasamy A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):557-565. PubMed ID: 35947251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer: Performance and usability of the Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer in healthy, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous patients.
    Morbio R; Longo C; De Vitto AML; Comacchio F; Della Porta LB; Marchini G
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 31(4):1850-1856. PubMed ID: 32722931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
    Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test Conditions in Macular Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma.
    Eura M; Matsumoto C; Hashimoto S; Okuyama S; Takada S; Nomoto H; Tanabe F; Shimomura Y
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 29045331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
    Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.