BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12771018)

  • 1. Mouse taste preference tests: why only two bottles?
    Tordoff MG; Bachmanov AA
    Chem Senses; 2003 May; 28(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 12771018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Taste solution preferences of C57BL/6J and 129X1/SvJ mice: influence of age, sex, and diet.
    Tordoff MG
    Chem Senses; 2007 Sep; 32(7):655-71. PubMed ID: 17566070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The maintenance diets of C57BL/6J and 129X1/SvJ mice influence their taste solution preferences: implications for large-scale phenotyping projects.
    Tordoff MG; Pilchak DM; Williams JA; McDaniel AH; Bachmanov AA
    J Nutr; 2002 Aug; 132(8):2288-97. PubMed ID: 12163677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of test duration on the sensitivity of the two-bottle choice test.
    Tordoff MG; Bachmanov AA
    Chem Senses; 2002 Nov; 27(9):759-68. PubMed ID: 12438201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chorda tympani responses in two inbred strains of mice with different taste preferences.
    Frank ME; Blizard DA
    Physiol Behav; 1999 Aug; 67(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 10477061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sapid solutions and food intake in repeated dehydration and rehydration periods in rats.
    Scalera G; Tarozzi G
    Exp Physiol; 2001 Jul; 86(4):489-98. PubMed ID: 11445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Mar; 90(4):602-11. PubMed ID: 17210165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):745-56. PubMed ID: 16529783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of altered taste preferences in tumor-bearing rats.
    Smith BK; Barker K; Schork MA; Kluger MJ
    Appetite; 1994 Dec; 23(3):219-30. PubMed ID: 7726541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sucrose motivation in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice measured by progressive ratio licking.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):734-44. PubMed ID: 16530236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gustatory preferences during estrus cycle in rats.
    Kanaka R; Dua-Sharma S; Sharma KN
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 1979; 23(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 575107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of the number of alcohol and water bottles on murine alcohol intake.
    Tordoff MG; Bachmanov AA
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2003 Apr; 27(4):600-6. PubMed ID: 12711922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intake of ethanol, sodium chloride, sucrose, citric acid, and quinine hydrochloride solutions by mice: a genetic analysis.
    Bachmanov AA; Reed DR; Tordoff MG; Price RA; Beauchamp GK
    Behav Genet; 1996 Nov; 26(6):563-73. PubMed ID: 8990535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forty mouse strain survey of water and sodium intake.
    Tordoff MG; Bachmanov AA; Reed DR
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Aug; 91(5):620-31. PubMed ID: 17490693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociation of ethanol and saccharin preference in fosB knockout mice.
    Korkosz A; Kolomanska P; Kowalska K; Rogowski A; Radwanska K; Kaczmarek L; Mierzejewski P; Scinska A; Kostowski W; Bienkowski P
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(2-3):391-5. PubMed ID: 15276803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effect of taste deafferentation on the preference for solutions of saccharose, saccharin and salt in rats].
    Serova ON; Esakov AI
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1986; 36(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 3705753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Taste preference and acceptance in thirsty and rehydrated [correction of dehydrated] rats.
    Scalera G
    Physiol Behav; 2000 Dec; 71(5):457-68. PubMed ID: 11239663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring gustatory variation in mice: a short-term fluid-intake test.
    Kotlus BS; Blizard DA
    Physiol Behav; 1998 Apr; 64(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 9661980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consumption of electrolytes and quinine by mouse strains with different blood pressures.
    Bachmanov AA; Schlager G; Tordoff MG; Beauchamp GK
    Physiol Behav; 1998 Jun; 64(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 9748100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preference for sucralose predicts behavioral responses to sweet and bittersweet tastants.
    Loney GC; Torregrossa AM; Carballo C; Eckel LA
    Chem Senses; 2012 Jun; 37(5):445-53. PubMed ID: 22281530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.