333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12771069)
1. Differences in operative mortality between high- and low-volume hospitals in Ontario for 5 major surgical procedures: estimating the number of lives potentially saved through regionalization.
Urbach DR; Bell CM; Austin PC
CMAJ; 2003 May; 168(11):1409-14. PubMed ID: 12771069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does it matter what a hospital is "high volume" for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data.
Urbach DR; Baxter NN
Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Oct; 13(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15465942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Misclassification of hospital volume with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare data.
Hollenbeck BK; Hong Ji ; Zaojun Ye ; Birkmeyer JD
Surg Innov; 2007 Sep; 14(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 17928618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Small rural hospitals and high-risk operations: how would regionalization affect surgical volume and hospital revenue?
Chappel AR; Zuckerman RS; Finlayson SR
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 203(5):599-604. PubMed ID: 17084319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Goshima KR; Mills JL; Awari K; Pike SL; Hughes JD
Ann Vasc Surg; 2008; 22(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 18411029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes?
Birkmeyer NJ; Goodney PP; Stukel TA; Hillner BE; Birkmeyer JD
Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):435-41. PubMed ID: 15622523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does it matter what a hospital is "high volume" for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data.
Urbach DR; Baxter NN
BMJ; 2004 Mar; 328(7442):737-40. PubMed ID: 15020356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome and survival of patients aged 75 years and older compared to younger patients after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: do the results justify the effort?
Shahidi S; Schroeder TV; Carstensen M; Sillesen H
Ann Vasc Surg; 2009; 23(4):469-77. PubMed ID: 19136232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of hospital characteristics on operative death and survival of patients after major cancer surgery in Ontario.
Simunovic M; Rempel E; Thériault ME; Coates A; Whelan T; Holowaty E; Langer B; Levine M
Can J Surg; 2006 Aug; 49(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 16948883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hospital teaching status and outcomes of complex surgical procedures in the United States.
Dimick JB; Cowan JA; Colletti LM; Upchurch GR
Arch Surg; 2004 Feb; 139(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 14769569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conventional models overestimate the statistical significance of volume-outcome associations, compared with multilevel models.
Urbach DR; Austin PC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 58(4):391-400. PubMed ID: 15862725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between volume and outcome following elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in 131 German hospitals.
Eckstein HH; Bruckner T; Heider P; Wolf O; Hanke M; Niedermeier HP; Noppeney T; Umscheid T; Wenk H
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 34(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 17601754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Socioeconomic status and surgical mortality in the elderly.
Birkmeyer NJ; Gu N; Baser O; Morris AM; Birkmeyer JD
Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9):893-9. PubMed ID: 18725842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative.
Birkmeyer JD; Finlayson EV; Birkmeyer CM
Surgery; 2001 Sep; 130(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 11562662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical volume and long-term survival following surgery for colorectal cancer in the Veterans Affairs Health-Care System.
Rabeneck L; Davila JA; Thompson M; El-Serag HB
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Apr; 99(4):668-75. PubMed ID: 15089900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjusting surgical mortality rates for patient comorbidities: more harm than good?
Finlayson EV; Birkmeyer JD; Stukel TA; Siewers AE; Lucas FL; Wennberg DE
Surgery; 2002 Nov; 132(5):787-94. PubMed ID: 12464861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures.
Birkmeyer JD; Dimick JB
Surgery; 2004 Jun; 135(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 15179361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in a district general hospital: a 15-years experience.
Qureshi NA; Rehman A; Slater N; Moss E; Shiralkar S; Patel RT; Grimley RP; Jayatunga AP
Ann Vasc Surg; 2007 Nov; 21(6):749-53. PubMed ID: 17512166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Volume-based referral for cancer surgery: informing the debate.
Hollenbeck BK; Dunn RL; Miller DC; Daignault S; Taub DA; Wei JT
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Jan; 25(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 17194909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
