651 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12771499)
1. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: survival of restorations after 2 years.
Mandari GJ; Truin GJ; van't Hof MA; Frencken JE
Caries Res; 2001; 35(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 11275667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years.
Taifour D; Frencken JE; Beiruti N; van 't Hof MA; Truin GJ
Caries Res; 2002; 36(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 12459617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.
Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years.
Frencken JE; Taifour D; van 't Hof MA
J Dent Res; 2006 Jul; 85(7):622-6. PubMed ID: 16798862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is high-viscosity glass-ionomer-cement a successor to amalgam for treating primary molars?
Hilgert LA; de Amorim RG; Leal SC; Mulder J; Creugers NH; Frencken JE
Dent Mater; 2014 Oct; 30(10):1172-8. PubMed ID: 25132283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of three restorative materials applied in a minimal intervention caries treatment approach.
Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Barbosa SH; Lauris JR; Franco EB
J Public Health Dent; 2003; 63(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 14682645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner.
Yassen G
J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19619427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year community field trial in Thailand--survival of one-surface restorations in the permanent dentition.
Phantumvanit P; Songpaisan Y; Pilot T; Frencken JE
J Public Health Dent; 1996; 56(3 Spec No):141-5; discussion 161-3. PubMed ID: 8915959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
Svanberg M
Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15124781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years.
Frencken JE; Makoni F; Sithole WD
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 26(6):372-81. PubMed ID: 9870536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of manual restorative treatment (MRT) with amalgam in high-caries Filipino children: results after 2 years.
Monse-Schneider B; Heinrich-Weltzien R; Schug D; Sheiham A; Borutta A
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 12641594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-year survival of one-surface ART restorations and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe.
Frencken JE; Makoni F; Sithole WD; Hackenitz E
Caries Res; 1998; 32(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 9544860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment restorations and sealants under field conditions.
Motsei SM; Kroon J; Holtshousen WS
SADJ; 2001 Jul; 56(7):309-15. PubMed ID: 11575114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results.
Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM; Yip HK; Smales RJ
Int Dent J; 2004 Feb; 54(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15005472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
