BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2806 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12771735)

  • 1. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of preoperative prostate specific antigen density and prostate specific antigen for predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the search data base.
    Freedland SJ; Kane CJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Amling CL; Dorey F; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):969-73. PubMed ID: 12576824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perineural invasion as a predictor of biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy for select men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
    D'Amico AV; Wu Y; Chen MH; Nash M; Renshaw AA; Richie JP
    J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):126-9. PubMed ID: 11125380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen.
    San Francisco IF; Regan MM; Olumi AF; DeWolf WC
    J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1492-9. PubMed ID: 15017206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preoperative p27 status is an independent predictor of prostate specific antigen failure following radical prostatectomy.
    Freedland SJ; deGregorio F; Sacoolidge JC; Elshimali YI; Csathy GS; Dorey F; Reiter RE; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1325-30. PubMed ID: 12629353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers.
    Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1596-600. PubMed ID: 11025712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is anastomotic biopsy necessary before radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy?
    Koppie TM; Grossfeld GD; Nudell DM; Weinberg VK; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 11435834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10.
    Bastian PJ; Gonzalgo ML; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Presti JC; Mangold LA; Humphreys E; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Freedland SJ
    Cancer; 2006 Sep; 107(6):1265-72. PubMed ID: 16900523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The extent of biopsy involvement as an independent predictor of extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in low risk prostate cancer: implications for treatment selection.
    Gao X; Mohideen N; Flanigan RC; Waters WB; Wojcik EM; Leman CR
    J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):1982-6. PubMed ID: 11061896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Side-specific factors associated with extracapsular extension and seminal vesicular invasion in men undergoing open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Sankin A; Tareen B; Lepor H
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2009; 12(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 19238170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
    Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The independent impact of extended pattern biopsy on prostate cancer stage migration.
    Master VA; Chi T; Simko JP; Weinberg V; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1789-93; discussion 1793. PubMed ID: 16217288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Percent tumor involvement and risk of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
    Rampersaud EN; Sun L; Moul JW; Madden J; Freedland SJ
    J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):571-6; discussion 576. PubMed ID: 18554662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The correlation among the percentage of positive biopsy cores from the dominant side of prostate, adverse pathology, and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
    Memis A; Ugurlu O; Ozden C; Oztekin CV; Aktas BK; Akdemir AO
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2011 Aug; 27(8):307-13. PubMed ID: 21802641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 141.