BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12771736)

  • 1. Should a positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy be pathological stage T2 or T3? Results from the SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson W; Presti JC; Kane CJ; Terris MK; Elashoff D; Amling CL;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2142-6. PubMed ID: 12771736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictors of prostate-specific antigen progression among men with seminal vesicle invasion at the time of radical prostatectomy.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Amling CL; Terris MK; Trock B; Kane CJ
    Cancer; 2004 Apr; 100(8):1633-8. PubMed ID: 15073850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Eastham JA; Kattan MW; Riedel E; Begg CB; Wheeler TM; Gerigk C; Gonen M; Reuter V; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2003 Dec; 170(6 Pt 1):2292-5. PubMed ID: 14634399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database.
    Buschemeyer WC; Hamilton RJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
    J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):124-9; discussion 129. PubMed ID: 17997433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of preoperative prostate specific antigen density and prostate specific antigen for predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the search data base.
    Freedland SJ; Kane CJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Amling CL; Dorey F; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):969-73. PubMed ID: 12576824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological factors that predict for prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schultz D; Schnall M; Tomaszewski JE; Wein A
    J Urol; 1995 Jul; 154(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 7539857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers.
    Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1596-600. PubMed ID: 11025712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Larger maximum tumor diameter at radical prostatectomy is associated with increased biochemical failure, metastasis, and death from prostate cancer after salvage radiation for prostate cancer.
    Johnson SB; Hamstra DA; Jackson WC; Zhou J; Foster B; Foster C; Song Y; Li D; Palapattu GS; Kunju L; Mehra R; Sandler H; Feng FY
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 23886418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What are the factors associated with short prostate specific antigen doubling time after radical prostatectomy? A report from the SEARCH database group.
    Teeter AE; Bañez LL; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ;
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1980-4; discussion 1985. PubMed ID: 18801519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
    Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The significance of a positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy: the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Stage T4 designation is not warranted.
    Pierorazio PM; Epstein JI; Humphreys E; Han M; Walsh PC; Partin AW
    J Urol; 2010 Jan; 183(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 19914651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic significance of preoperative factors in localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy: importance of percentage of biopsies that contain tumor and the presence of biopsy perineural invasion.
    Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Brenner PC; Kooner R; Golovsky D; O'Neill GF; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD
    Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1884-93. PubMed ID: 12673714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E
    Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of age on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Ozden C; Aktas BK; Bulut S; Erbay G; Tagci S; Gokkaya CS; Baykam MM; Memis A
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 33(2):91-95. PubMed ID: 28137417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prostate specific antigen outcome based on the extent of extracapsular extension and margin status in patients with seminal vesicle negative prostate carcinoma of Gleason score < or = 7.
    D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schultz D; Tomaszewski JE; Wein A
    Cancer; 2000 May; 88(9):2110-5. PubMed ID: 10813723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.