330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12771737)
1. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does site specific labeling of sextant biopsy cores predict the site of extracapsular extension in radical prostatectomy surgical specimen.
Taneja SS; Penson DF; Epelbaum A; Handler T; Lepor H
J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1352-7; discussion 1357-8. PubMed ID: 10492195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perineural invasion as a predictor of biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy for select men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Wu Y; Chen MH; Nash M; Renshaw AA; Richie JP
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):126-9. PubMed ID: 11125380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical safety and feasibility of a newly developed, simple algorithm for decision-making on neurovascular bundle preservation in radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto K; Hisasue S; Masumori N; Kobayashi K; Kato R; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 40(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 19959505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perineural invasion in prostate cancer biopsies is not associated with higher rates of positive surgical margins.
Cannon GM; Pound CR; Landsittel DP; Bastacky SI; Dhir R; Becich MJ; Nelson JB
Prostate; 2005 Jun; 63(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 15602747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of intraoperative biopsies during radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Lepor H; Kaci L
Urology; 2004 Mar; 63(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 15028445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens assessed by digital image analysis software correlates with other prognostic factors.
Sherwin JC; Mirmilstein G; Pedersen J; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D; Mills J
J Urol; 2010 May; 183(5):1808-14. PubMed ID: 20303103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of perineural invasion and other biopsy characteristics as prognostic markers for localized prostate cancer.
Epstein JI
Semin Urol Oncol; 1998 Aug; 16(3):124-8. PubMed ID: 9741416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current results and patient selection for nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Steiner MS
Semin Urol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 13(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 8521134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Side-specific factors associated with extracapsular extension and seminal vesicular invasion in men undergoing open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Sankin A; Tareen B; Lepor H
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2009; 12(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 19238170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate.
Brown JA; Rodin DM; Harisinghani M; Dahl DM
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18640062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Wieder JA; Soloway MS
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):299-315. PubMed ID: 9679867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively?
Rubin MA; Mucci NR; Manley S; Sanda M; Cushenberry E; Strawderman M; Montie JE; Bassily NH
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 11125378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate specific antigen recurrence rates are low after radical retropubic prostatectomy and positive margins.
Simon MA; Kim S; Soloway MS
J Urol; 2006 Jan; 175(1):140-4; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 16406892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Secin FP; Serio A; Bianco FJ; Karanikolas NT; Kuroiwa K; Vickers A; Touijer K; Guillonneau B
Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 17098356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neurovascular bundle resection: does it improve the margins?
Lepor H; Tareen B
Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 20219562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
Ficarra V; Novara G; Secco S; D'Elia C; Boscolo-Berto R; Gardiman M; Cavalleri S; Artibani W
J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2682-8. PubMed ID: 19836778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
