BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12771846)

  • 1. Bioabsorbable miniplating versus metallic fixation for metacarpal fractures.
    Waris E; Ashammakhi N; Happonen H; Raatikainen T; Kaarela O; Törmälä P; Santavirta S; Konttinen YT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 May; (410):310-9. PubMed ID: 12771846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-reinforced bioabsorbable versus metallic fixation systems for metacarpal and phalangeal fractures: a biomechanical study.
    Waris E; Ashammakhi N; Raatikainen T; Törmälä P; Santavirta S; Konttinen YT
    J Hand Surg Am; 2002 Sep; 27(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 12239683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of bioabsorbable osteofixation devices in the hand.
    Waris E; Ashammakhi N; Kaarela O; Raatikainen T; Vasenius J
    J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Dec; 29(6):590-8. PubMed ID: 15542222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-reinforced bioabsorbable miniplates for skeletal fixation in complex hand injury: three case reports.
    Waris E; Ninkovic M; Harpf C; Ninkovic M; Ashammakhi N
    J Hand Surg Am; 2004 May; 29(3):452-7. PubMed ID: 15140489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of subcapital femoral neck fractures with bioabsorbable or metallic screw fixation. A preliminary report.
    Jukkala-Partio K; Partio EK; Helevirta P; Pohjonen T; Törmälä P; Rokkanen P
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 2000; 89(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 10791645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mini and micro plating of phalangeal and metacarpal fractures: a biomechanical study.
    Prevel CD; Eppley BL; Jackson JR; Moore K; McCarty M; Sood R; Wood R [corrected to Sood R]
    J Hand Surg Am; 1995 Jan; 20(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 7722264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of internal fixation techniques in metacarpal fractures.
    Black D; Mann RJ; Constine R; Daniels AU
    J Hand Surg Am; 1985 Jul; 10(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 4020056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Internal fixation of oblique metacarpal fractures. A biomechanical evaluation by impact loading.
    Firoozbakhsh KK; Moneim MS; Doherty W; Naraghi FF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Apr; (325):296-301. PubMed ID: 8998890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical comparison of novel bioabsorbable plates with titanium plates and small-series clinical comparisons for metacarpal fractures.
    Sakai A; Oshige T; Zenke Y; Menuki K; Murai T; Nakamura T
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):1597-604. PubMed ID: 22992850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative biomechanical analysis of resorbable rigid fixation versus titanium rigid fixation of metacarpal fractures.
    Prevel CD; Eppley BL; Ge J; Winkler MM; Katona TR; D'Alessio K; Sarver D
    Ann Plast Surg; 1996 Oct; 37(4):377-85. PubMed ID: 8905045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative biomechanical stability of titanium bone fixation systems in metacarpal fractures.
    Prevel CD; McCarty M; Katona T; Moore K; Jackson JR; Eppley BL; Sood R
    Ann Plast Surg; 1995 Jul; 35(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 7574288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical testing of bioresorbable implants for use in metacarpal fracture fixation.
    Bozic KJ; Perez LE; Wilson DR; Fitzgibbons PG; Jupiter JB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2001 Jul; 26(4):755-61. PubMed ID: 11466654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical failure of metacarpal fracture resorbable plate fixation.
    Lionelli GT; Korentager RA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2002 Aug; 49(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 12187350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive bioabsorbable bone plates for rigid internal fixation of mandible fractures.
    Gaball C; Lovald S; Baack B; Olson G
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2011; 13(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 21242429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bioabsorbable plates and screws for fixation of mandibulotomies in ablative oral cancer surgery.
    Ketola-Kinnula T; Suuronen R; Kontio R; Laine P; Lindqvist C
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1753-62. PubMed ID: 20018418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low-profile versus conventional metacarpal plating systems: a comparison of construct stiffness and strength.
    Fischer KJ; Bastidas JA; Provenzano DA; Tomaino MM
    J Hand Surg Am; 1999 Sep; 24(5):928-34. PubMed ID: 10509270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A biomechanical study comparing plate fixation using unicortical and bicortical screws in transverse metacarpal fracture models subjected to cyclic loading.
    Afshar R; Fong TS; Latifi MH; Kanthan SR; Kamarul T
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2012 Jun; 37(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 22019989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Biomechanical comparison of six different fixation techniques for treatment of metacarpal neck fractures].
    Gick S; Oppermann J; Owerst I; Pennig D; Dargel J
    Unfallchirurg; 2019 Aug; 122(8):587-595. PubMed ID: 31123800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of soft tissues in metacarpal fracture fixation.
    Ouellette EA; Dennis JJ; Milne EL; Latta LL; Makowski AL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Jul; (412):169-75. PubMed ID: 12838068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical design optimization of bioabsorbable fixation devices for bone fractures.
    Lovald ST; Khraishi T; Wagner J; Baack B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):389-98. PubMed ID: 19242363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.