These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12772653)

  • 21. "Regarded as" disabled.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2005; 16(4):29-33. PubMed ID: 16061156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Supreme Court decisions impact ADA.
    D'Arruda K
    AAOHN J; 2000 Jul; 48(7):322-4. PubMed ID: 11261179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. California's expanded protection.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2006; 17(4):28-33. PubMed ID: 16867880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Chevron v Echazabal: protection, opportunity, and paternalism.
    Daniels N
    Am J Public Health; 2003 Apr; 93(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 12660194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Flawed language or judges rule.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2006; 17(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 16473249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. U.S. Supreme Court to review drug addiction case.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2003; 14(5):26-9. PubMed ID: 14593342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Supreme Court. High Court says ADA's 'direct threat' includes threat to self.
    AIDS Policy Law; 2002 Jul; 17(12):1, 4. PubMed ID: 12134792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 2006 employment decisions under the ADA Title I--survey update.
    Allbright AL
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2007; 31(3):328-31. PubMed ID: 17691529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The definition of disability: perspective of the disability community.
    Kaplan D
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):352-64. PubMed ID: 15015484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Supreme court reviews drug addiction case.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2004; 15(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 15026764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Supreme Court clarifies scope of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
    J Med Pract Manage; 1999; 15(3):143-4. PubMed ID: 10725047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 2010 employment decisions under the ADA Titles I and V--survey update.
    Allbright AL
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2011; 35(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 21834498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The ADA and the Supreme Court: a mixed record.
    Bagenstos SR
    JAMA; 2015 Jun; 313(22):2217-8. PubMed ID: 26057276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Physician practice groups--the effect of Clackamas.
    Siegel S
    Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Sep; ():3-8. PubMed ID: 14526527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. AIDS caps, contraceptive coverage, and the law: an analysis of the federal anti-discrimination statutes' applicability to health insurance.
    Hoffman S
    Cardozo Law Rev; 2002 Mar; 23(4):1315-62. PubMed ID: 16506334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bragdon v. Abbott, asymptomatic genetic conditions, and antidiscrimination law: a conservative perspective.
    Clegg R
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):409-29. PubMed ID: 15015487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Olmstead decision and the journey toward integration:the evolution of social work responses.
    Yong F
    J Gerontol Soc Work; 2007; 49(1-2):115-26. PubMed ID: 17804363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. More on reasonable accommodation.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2005; 16(3):36-40. PubMed ID: 15999083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Supreme Court clarifies employee/employer status.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2003; 14(4):30-4. PubMed ID: 12869946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Defining disabled: a study of the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 in eliminating the consideration of certain mitigating measures.
    Leonard JW
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2009; 26(1):125-47. PubMed ID: 20112621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.