These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12773016)

  • 1. Study samples are too small to produce sufficiently precise reliability coefficients.
    Charter RA
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 12773016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A breakdown of reliability coefficients by test type and reliability method, and the clinical implications of low reliability.
    Charter RA
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Jul; 130(3):290-304. PubMed ID: 12926514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size requirements for precise estimates of reliability, generalizability, and validity coefficients.
    Charter RA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1999 Aug; 21(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 10550813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical approaches to achieving sufficiently high test score reliabilities for research purposes.
    Charter RA
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jul; 135(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18649491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis.
    Peterson RA; Brown SP
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jan; 90(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 15641898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Determination of reliability of psychometric tests in psychiatry using canonical correlation].
    Koch HJ; Gürtler K; Fischer-Barnicol D; Szecsey A; Ibach B
    Psychiatr Prax; 2003 May; 30 Suppl 2():S157-60. PubMed ID: 14509065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychometric inferences from a meta-analysis of reliability and internal consistency coefficients.
    Botella J; Suero M; Gambara H
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Dec; 15(4):386-97. PubMed ID: 20853953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size planning for longitudinal models: accuracy in parameter estimation for polynomial change parameters.
    Kelley K; Rausch JR
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 21744968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding and using confidence intervals in clinical research.
    Visintainer PF; Tejani N
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1998; 7(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 9730488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical extensions of Ponterotto and Ruckdeschel's (2007) reliability matrix for estimating the adequacy of internal consistency coefficients.
    Ponterotto JG; Charter RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Jun; 108(3):878-86. PubMed ID: 19725323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size of randomized double-blind trials 1976-1991.
    Mulward S; Gotzsche PC
    Dan Med Bull; 1996 Feb; 43(1):96-8. PubMed ID: 8906985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Setting sample size to ensure narrow confidence intervals for precise estimation of population values.
    Corty EW; Corty RW
    Nurs Res; 2011; 60(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 21336224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and validity of the short form of the child health questionnaire for parents (CHQ-PF28) in large random school based and general population samples.
    Raat H; Botterweck AM; Landgraf JM; Hoogeveen WC; Essink-Bot ML
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Jan; 59(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 15598731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.
    Fritz CO; Morris PE; Richler JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 Feb; 141(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 21823805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: a 30-year review.
    Aguinis H; Beaty JC; Boik RJ; Pierce CA
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jan; 90(1):94-107. PubMed ID: 15641892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Samples in applied psychology: over a decade of research in review.
    Shen W; Kiger TB; Davies SE; Rasch RL; Simon KM; Ones DS
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):1055-64. PubMed ID: 21463013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test-retest reliability of the alcohol use disorder identification test in a general population sample.
    Selin KH
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2003 Sep; 27(9):1428-35. PubMed ID: 14506403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability, effect size, and responsiveness of health status measures in the design of randomized and cluster-randomized trials.
    Diehr P; Chen L; Patrick D; Feng Z; Yasui Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Feb; 26(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 15837452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity and reliability of the Turkish Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire.
    Ertaş M; Siva A; Dalkara T; Uzuner N; Dora B; Inan L; Idiman F; Sarica Y; Selçuki D; Sirin H; Oğuzhanoğlu A; Irkeç C; Ozmenoğlu M; Ozbenli T; Oztürk M; Saip S; Neyal M; Zarifoğlu M;
    Headache; 2004 Sep; 44(8):786-93. PubMed ID: 15330825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Small-sample performance of the robust score test and its modifications in generalized estimating equations.
    Guo X; Pan W; Connett JE; Hannan PJ; French SA
    Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3479-95. PubMed ID: 15977302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.