These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12773021)

  • 21. Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies.
    Taylor SF; Kornblum S; Lauber EJ; Minoshima S; Koeppe RA
    Neuroimage; 1997 Aug; 6(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 9299382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adults' versus children's performance on the Stroop task: interference and facilitation.
    Wright BC; Wanley A
    Br J Psychol; 2003 Nov; 94(Pt 4):475-85. PubMed ID: 14687456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference.
    Cho YS; Choi JM; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):416-29. PubMed ID: 22147533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reading ability is negatively related to Stroop interference.
    Protopapas A; Archonti A; Skaloumbakas C
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 May; 54(3):251-82. PubMed ID: 16962090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Response variations to Stroop color-word stimuli.
    Izawa C; Silver NC
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 1988 May; 114(2):211-55. PubMed ID: 3402729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The lateralized emotional stroop task: left visual field interference in women.
    Van Strien JW; Valstar LH
    Emotion; 2004 Dec; 4(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 15571438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.
    Augustinova M; Flaudias V; Ferrand L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Dec; 17(6):827-33. PubMed ID: 21169576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Experimental evidence for interpretive but not attention biases towards somatic information in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.
    Moss-Morris R; Petrie KJ
    Br J Health Psychol; 2003 May; 8(Pt 2):195-208. PubMed ID: 12804333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contributions of response set and semantic relatedness to cross-modal Stroop-like picture-word interference in children and adults.
    Hanauer JB; Brooks PJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2005 Jan; 90(1):21-47. PubMed ID: 15596075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Color priming affects Stroop interference.
    McClain L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):643-51. PubMed ID: 6866673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A sensory origin for color-word Stroop effects in aging: a meta-analysis.
    Ben-David BM; Schneider BA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2009 Sep; 16(5):505-34. PubMed ID: 19479479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An optimal viewing position effect in the Stroop task when only one letter is the color carrier.
    Parris BA; Sharma D; Weekes B
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 17953147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stroop-like serial position effects in color naming of words and nonwords.
    Marmurek HH; Proctor C; Javor A
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 16909934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Individual differences in Stroop dilution: tests of the attention-capture hypothesis.
    Yee PL; Hunt E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):715-25. PubMed ID: 1834786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference.
    Lindsay DS; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 8189189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?
    Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 15945205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interactions between color and word processing in a flanker task.
    Henik A; Ro T; Merrill D; Rafal R; Safadi Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Feb; 25(1):198-209. PubMed ID: 10069032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Self-monitoring, need for cognition, and the Stroop effect: a preliminary study.
    Koch C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):212-4. PubMed ID: 12705528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.