These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12773470)

  • 1. Determining access to assisted reproductive technology: reactions of clinic directors to ethically complex case scenarios.
    Stern JE; Cramer CP; Green RM; Garrod A; DeVries KO
    Hum Reprod; 2003 Jun; 18(6):1343-52. PubMed ID: 12773470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Islamic perspectives in human reproduction.
    Serour GI
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008; 17 Suppl 3():34-8. PubMed ID: 18983735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assisted reproductive technology: perspectives in Halakha (Jewish religious law).
    Schenker JG
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008; 17 Suppl 3():17-24. PubMed ID: 18983733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assisted reproductive practice: religious perspectives.
    Schenker JG
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Mar; 10(3):310-9. PubMed ID: 15820035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
    Okun N; Sierra S; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethics and assisted reproduction.
    Fasouliotis SJ; Schenker JG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2000 Jun; 90(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 10825637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ethics of sex selection: a comparison of the attitudes and experiences of primary care physicians and physician providers of clinical sex selection services.
    Puri S; Nachtigall RD
    Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2107-14. PubMed ID: 19342036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward a bioethical issue: induced multiple pregnancies and neonatal outcomes.
    Zuppa AA; Alighieri G; Catenazzi P; Scorrano A; Romagnoli C
    Ital J Pediatr; 2010 Nov; 36():74. PubMed ID: 21070661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pandora's progeny: ethical issues in assisted human reproduction.
    Cameron NM
    Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):745-79. PubMed ID: 16610155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical attitudes of German specialists in reproductive medicine and legal regulation of preimplantation sex selection in Germany.
    Wilhelm M; Dahl E; Alexander H; Brähler E; Stöbel-Richter Y
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e56390. PubMed ID: 23437121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted reproduction--Islamic views on the science of procreation.
    Ahmad NH
    Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth; 2003 Mar; 13(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 17117542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The embryo as a legal entity -- woman as a fetal environment: the new German laws on reproductive engineering and embryo research.
    Waldschmidt A
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):209-22. PubMed ID: 11651216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Medical and ethical basis for embryo cryopreservation].
    Zegers-Hochschild F; Crosby JA; Salas SP
    Rev Med Chil; 2014 Jul; 142(7):896-902. PubMed ID: 25378009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of reproductive technology for sex selection for nonmedical reasons.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jun; 103(6):1418-22. PubMed ID: 25956364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted reproduction practice in Europe: legal and ethical aspects.
    Schenker JG
    Hum Reprod Update; 1997; 3(2):173-84. PubMed ID: 9286740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Federal Medical Council (CFM) of Brazil adopts resolutions on criteria for death and on medically assisted procreation.
    Brazil. Federal Medical Council
    Int Dig Health Legis; 1994; 45(1):100-2. PubMed ID: 11660644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Women's right to choose rationally: genetic information, embryo selection, and genetic manipulation.
    Chambers JE
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2003; 12(4):418-28. PubMed ID: 14619374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Non-Medical Sex Selection and Saviour Sibling Selection in the Case of JS and LS v Patient Review Panel: Beyond the Welfare of the Child?
    Smith MK; Taylor-Sands M
    J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Mar; 15(1):139-153. PubMed ID: 29396799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The birds, the bees, and the deep freeze: is there international consensus in the debate over assisted reproductive technologies?
    Pitrolo EA
    Houst J Int Law; 1996; 19(1):147-206. PubMed ID: 12666682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does bioethics provide answers?: Secular and religious bioethics and our procreative future.
    Smolin DM
    Cumberland Law Rev; 2004-2005; 35(3):473-517. PubMed ID: 16715560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.