These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12774097)

  • 1. Disruption to science in developing countries.
    Barcinski MA
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480. PubMed ID: 12774097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confidential reports may improve peer review.
    Cintas P
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):255. PubMed ID: 15029169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Where did the scientific method go?
    Noseda M; McLean GR
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 18183010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response to Where did the scientific method go?
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):29. PubMed ID: 18183012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality evaluation needs some better quality tools.
    Döring TF
    Nature; 2007 Feb; 445(7129):709. PubMed ID: 17301769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review.
    Scarfe WC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Citation rate unrelated to journals' impact factors.
    Waheed AA
    Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6966):495. PubMed ID: 14654813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Is it worthwhile to be a reviewer for a medical-scientific journal?].
    Shoenfeld Y; Shemer J; Keren G
    Harefuah; 2009 Dec; 148(12):824. PubMed ID: 20088435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view.
    Senturia SD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jan; 51(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 14995024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The manuscript review process.
    Triadafilopoulos G
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6 Suppl):S23-5. PubMed ID: 17113850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The importance of peer review.
    Poland GA
    Vaccine; 2013 Jan; 31(4):567-83. PubMed ID: 23298688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In scientific publishing at the article level, effort matters more than journal impact factors: hard work and co-authors overshadow journal venue in acquiring citations.
    Winker K
    Bioessays; 2011 Jun; 33(6):400-2. PubMed ID: 21538415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Korean scandal will have global fallout.
    Check E; Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7071):1056-7. PubMed ID: 16371963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact factors aren't top journals' sole attraction.
    Törnqvist TE
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480. PubMed ID: 12774096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The system rewards a dishonest approach.
    Brookfield J
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Globalizing science publishing.
    Gevers W
    Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):920. PubMed ID: 19696315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.
    van Loon AJ
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Authorship.
    Watts C
    Surg Neurol; 2009 Jul; 72(1):99. PubMed ID: 19559939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. If it's too good to be true, it probably is.
    Kennedy MS
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Dec; 109(12):7. PubMed ID: 19935148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Authorship and co-authorship].
    Haug C
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.