These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1277416)

  • 1. Failure of demand pacing with small surface area electrodes.
    Hughes HC; Brownlee RR; Tyers GF
    Circulation; 1976 Jul; 54(1):128-32. PubMed ID: 1277416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Myocardial stimulation impedance: the effects of electrode, physiological, and stimulus variables.
    Tyers GF; Brownlee RR; Hughes HC; Shaffer CW; Williams EH; Kao RL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1979 Jan; 27(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 453959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The advantages of transthoracic placement of permanent cardiac pacemaker electrodes.
    Tyers GF; Hughes HC; Torman HA; Waldhausen JA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1975 Jan; 69(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 1110578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefits of smaller electrode surface area (4 mm2) on steroid-eluting leads.
    Schuchert A; Kuck KH
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Dec; 14(12):2098-104. PubMed ID: 1723192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of stimulation site on ventricular threshold in dogs with heart block.
    Hughes HC; Tyers GF
    Am Heart J; 1975 Jan; 89(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 1109554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The mythology of threshold variations as a function of electrode surface area.
    Stokes KB; Bird T; Gunderson B
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 2):1748-51. PubMed ID: 1721168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Low stimulation impedance in pacemaker patients with cardiac diseases. The Thera Pacemaker Study Group].
    Schuchert A; van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Aug; 121(34-35):1046-9. PubMed ID: 8829905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Porous electrodes: concept, technology and results.
    MacCarter DJ; Lundberg KM; Corstjens JP
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Mar; 6(2 Pt 2):427-35. PubMed ID: 6189088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Low pacing thresholds of ventricular pacemaker leads: not a marker for large R-wave amplitudes and high impedance values].
    Schuchert A; Bornhoff S; Meinertz T
    Z Kardiol; 1995 Dec; 84(12):971-6. PubMed ID: 8578793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The choice of the pacemaker-electrode combination.
    Thalen HJ
    G Ital Cardiol; 1978; 8 Suppl 1():81-6. PubMed ID: 754987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polarization properties of small-surface-area pacemaker electrodes--implications on reliability of sensing and pacing.
    Fischler H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1979 Jul; 2(4):403-16. PubMed ID: 95309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of electrode position on the detection of the transvenous cardiac electrogram.
    Hughes HC; Brownlee RR; Bertolet RD; Neff P; Sluetz JE; Tyers GF
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1980 Nov; 3(6):651-5. PubMed ID: 6161344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The porous endocardial electrode.
    Amundson DC; McArthur W; Mosharrafa M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1979 Jan; 2(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 95264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparative studies of thresholds after implantation of pacemaker leads of different size (author's transl)].
    Kleinert M; Irnich W; Beer P
    Z Kardiol; 1977 Apr; 66(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 857458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between pacemaker fibrillation thresholds and electrode area.
    Chen P; Myers GH; Parsonnet V; Chatterjee K; Katz P
    Med Instrum; 1975; 9(4):165-70. PubMed ID: 1143115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute and chronic stimulation thresholds of intramyocardial screw-in pacemaker electrodes.
    Starr DS; Lawrie GM; Morris GC
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1981 Apr; 31(4):334-8. PubMed ID: 7212836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intracardiac electrogram parameters, electrode surface area and pacer input impedance: their correlations.
    Antonioli EG; Baggioni FG; Grassi G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1980; 10(5):536-53. PubMed ID: 7450375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pacing and sensing: how can one electrode fulfill both requirements?
    Sinnaeve A; Willems R; Backers J; Holovoet G; Stroobandt R
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 May; 10(3 Pt 1):546-54. PubMed ID: 2440005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Paradigm shift in lead design.
    Irnich W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Sep; 22(9):1321-32. PubMed ID: 10527013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of local steroid elution on chronic pacing threshold and impedance of endocardial pacemaker leads.
    Schuchert A; Kuck KH
    Cardiology; 1993; 83(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 8281540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.