275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12774574)
1. Innovation and patents: in vitro diagnostics.
Carter S
Med Device Technol; 2003 May; 14(4):24. PubMed ID: 12774574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Patent protection in modern medical technology].
Bosch M
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 2():686-7. PubMed ID: 12465274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The exclusion of diagnostic methods from patentability by the EPC: a case for review?
Ricker M
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1167-8. PubMed ID: 15340482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Community registered design.
Carter S
Med Device Technol; 2003 Apr; 14(3):8. PubMed ID: 12789691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Brussels takes EU states to court over biopatent law.
Habeck M
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):960. PubMed ID: 12949544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 364 May 2007. Patents, medicine, and the interests of patients.
Committees on Ethics and Genetics of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 109(5):1249-54. PubMed ID: 17470613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EU to review rare disease drugs market exclusivity.
Sheridan C
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1061. PubMed ID: 15340455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Proposed changes to patent code loom over biotech industry.
Coombs A
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 25(12):1333-4. PubMed ID: 18066010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The coming US patent opposition.
Apple T
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Feb; 23(2):245-7. PubMed ID: 15696151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Who owns the human genome? What can ownership mean with respect to genes?
Markl H
IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law; 2002; 33(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15156889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Patent law: avoiding pitfalls].
Kruspig RA
Chirurg; 2006 Nov; Suppl():354-5. PubMed ID: 17598272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clarity and risk: the challenges of the new technologies.
Williams D
Med Device Technol; 2001 Nov; 12(9):12-4. PubMed ID: 12938531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shares in the human genome--the future of patenting DNA.
Thomas SM; Hopkins MM; Brady M
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1185-8. PubMed ID: 12454661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. EPO neem patent revocation revives biopiracy debate.
Sheridan C
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 May; 23(5):511-2. PubMed ID: 15877054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Material witness: patent pending.
Ball P
Nat Mater; 2003 Jun; 2(6):365. PubMed ID: 12776101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Emerging patent issues in genomic diagnostics.
Barton JH
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 24(8):939-41. PubMed ID: 16900135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patents versus settling for the soft option.
Carter S
Med Device Technol; 2004 Mar; 15(2):19. PubMed ID: 15154334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of gene patenting on R&D and commerce.
Stott M; Valentine J
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):729-31; author reply 731. PubMed ID: 12833081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patent law--balancing profit maximization and public access to technology.
Beckerman-Rodau A
Columbia Sci Technol Law Rev; 2003; 4():E1. PubMed ID: 15977333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are the Brookhill-Wilk patents impediments to market growth in cybersurgery?
McLean TR; Torrance AW
Int J Med Robot; 2008 Mar; 4(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 18275034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
