695 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12774682)
21. Tort reform... what happens next?
Brune DA
J Med Assoc Ga; 2004; (2):3. PubMed ID: 15641302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Statutory caps: an involuntary contribution to the medical malpractice insurance crisis or a reasonable mechanism for obtaining affordable health care?
Chupkovich PJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():337-75. PubMed ID: 10126943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Medical errors, medical negligence, and professional medical liability reform.
Rosenbaum S
Public Health Rep; 2003; 118(3):272-4. PubMed ID: 12766221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Are new liability caps working?
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2003 Feb; 12(2):14-6. PubMed ID: 12658849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Foiled again. Senate again fails to pass malpractice reform.
Fong T
Mod Healthc; 2004 Mar; 34(9):18. PubMed ID: 15029683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Insurance. California, here we come.
Haugh R
Hosp Health Netw; 2002 Oct; 76(10):16, 18, 4. PubMed ID: 12416453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MSMS efforts to preserve Michigan's tort reform are paying off.
Madigan WE; Schulte DJ
Mich Med; 2004; 103(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 14986520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. An empirical and critical look at the current medical liability crisis.
Kinney ED
Front Health Serv Manage; 2003; 20(1):31-7; discussion 39-42. PubMed ID: 14510316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Tort reform 2004. The legislative perspective.
Brown AG
Md Med; 2004; 5(2):34-6. PubMed ID: 15227949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Medical tort reform: a novel approach.
Hancock CR
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Nov; 3(11):829-31. PubMed ID: 17412179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Effective legal reform and the malpractice insurance crisis.
Anderson RE
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):343-55. PubMed ID: 15742580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Turning from damage caps to information disclosure: an alternative to tort reform.
Zeiler K
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):385-98. PubMed ID: 15742583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Malpractice crisis and reform.
Bovbjerg RR
Clin Perinatol; 2005 Mar; 32(1):203-33, viii-ix. PubMed ID: 15777830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Malpractice relief. Lower premiums, tort reform add to Alaska's appeal.
Firth A; Holmes R
Alaska Med; 2009 Sep; 51():5-6, 33. PubMed ID: 19998706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. "The medical liability system is melting down".
Coble YD; Palmisano DJ
Med Econ; 2003 Mar; 80(6):49-50. PubMed ID: 12698626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. What hope is there for meaningful tort reform to stop another malpractice crisis?
Henley E
J Fam Pract; 2006 Sep; 55(9):782-6. PubMed ID: 16948962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Lessons learned from the "laboratories of democracy": a critique of federal medical liability reform.
Conroy AD
Cornell Law Rev; 2006 Jul; 91(5):1159-202. PubMed ID: 16827219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Tort reform 2004. The MedChi perspective.
Schwartz JA
Md Med; 2004; 5(2):28-9. PubMed ID: 15227946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. An empirical examination of the equal protection challenge to contingency fee restrictions in medical malpractice reform statutes.
Dwyer CL
Duke Law J; 2006 Nov; 56(2):611-41. PubMed ID: 17302005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Tort reform 2004. The medical mutual perspective.
Murray D
Md Med; 2004; 5(2):32-3. PubMed ID: 15227948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
