BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12774996)

  • 21. Hotspot detection and spatial distribution of methane emissions from landfills by a surface probe method.
    Gonzalez-Valencia R; Magana-Rodriguez F; Cristóbal J; Thalasso F
    Waste Manag; 2016 Sep; 55():299-305. PubMed ID: 26973281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Short-term landfill methane emissions dependency on wind.
    Delkash M; Zhou B; Han B; Chow FK; Rella CW; Imhoff PT
    Waste Manag; 2016 Sep; 55():288-98. PubMed ID: 26896003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Characterization of odor emission on the working face of landfill and establishing of odorous compounds index.
    Wenjing L; Zhenhan D; Dong L; Jimenez LM; Yanjun L; Hanwen G; Hongtao W
    Waste Manag; 2015 Aug; 42():74-81. PubMed ID: 25997990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measured gas emissions from four landfills in south africa and some implications for landfill design and methane recovery in semi-arid climates.
    Fourie AB; Morris JW
    Waste Manag Res; 2004 Dec; 22(6):440-53. PubMed ID: 15666447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation of fugitive landfill methane emissions using surface emission monitoring and Genetic Algorithms optimization.
    Kormi T; Mhadhebi S; Bel Hadj Ali N; Abichou T; Green R
    Waste Manag; 2018 Feb; 72():313-328. PubMed ID: 27887773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Numerical simulations to assess the tracer dilution method for measurement of landfill methane emissions.
    Taylor DM; Chow FK; Delkash M; Imhoff PT
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():298-309. PubMed ID: 27395754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of atmospheric pressure on CH4 and CO2 emission from a closed landfill site in Manchester, UK.
    Nwachukwu AN; Anonye D
    Environ Monit Assess; 2013 Jul; 185(7):5729-35. PubMed ID: 23160719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An analytical model for estimating the reduction of methane emission through landfill cover soils by methane oxidation.
    Yao Y; Su Y; Wu Y; Liu W; He R
    J Hazard Mater; 2015; 283():871-9. PubMed ID: 25464331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of odorous compounds at municipal landfill sites.
    Sadowska-Rociek A; Kurdziel M; Szczepaniec-Cieciak E; Riesenmey C; Vaillant H; Batton-Hubert M; Piejko K
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Dec; 27(10):966-75. PubMed ID: 19710115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Guidelines for landfill gas emission monitoring using the tracer gas dispersion method.
    Scheutz C; Kjeldsen P
    Waste Manag; 2019 Feb; 85():351-360. PubMed ID: 30803590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluating the impact of odors from the 1955 landfills in China using a bottom-up approach.
    Cai B; Wang J; Long Y; Li W; Liu J; Ni Z; Bo X; Li D; Wang J; Chen X; Gao Q; Zhang L
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Dec; 164():206-14. PubMed ID: 26398549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Uncertainty analysis for evaluating methane emissions from municipal solid waste landfill in Beijing].
    Chen CC; Liu CL; Li Z; Wang HH; Zhang Y; Wang L
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2012 Jan; 33(1):208-15. PubMed ID: 22452212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Seasonal variability in CH4 emissions from a landfill in a cool, semiarid climate.
    Klusman RW; Dick CJ
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Sep; 50(9):1632-6. PubMed ID: 11055159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Simultaneous mitigation of methane and odors in a biowindow using a pipe network.
    Jung H; Oh KC; Ryu HW; Jeon JM; Cho KS
    Waste Manag; 2019 Dec; 100():45-56. PubMed ID: 31520912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing methods to estimate emissions of non-methane organic compounds from landfills.
    Saquing JM; Chanton JP; Yazdani R; Barlaz MA; Scheutz C; Blake DR; Imhoff PT
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2260-70. PubMed ID: 25108756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Odor pollution from landfill sites and its control: a review].
    Hu B; Ding Y; Wu WX; Hu BG; Chen YX
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2010 Mar; 21(3):785-90. PubMed ID: 20560339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Compositional and physicochemical changes in waste materials and biogas production across 7 landfill sites in UK.
    Frank RR; Cipullo S; Garcia J; Davies S; Wagland ST; Villa R; Trois C; Coulon F
    Waste Manag; 2017 May; 63():11-17. PubMed ID: 27577751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determination of gas recovery efficiency at two Danish landfills by performing downwind methane measurements and stable carbon isotopic analysis.
    Aghdam EF; Fredenslund AM; Chanton J; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2018 Mar; 73():220-229. PubMed ID: 29249311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Uncontrolled methane emissions from a MSW landfill surface: influence of landfill features and side slopes.
    Di Trapani D; Di Bella G; Viviani G
    Waste Manag; 2013 Oct; 33(10):2108-15. PubMed ID: 23465313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spatio-temporal variation of landfill gas in pilot-scale semi-aerobic and anaerobic landfills over 5years.
    Wu X; Yue B; Huang Q; Wang Q; Lin Y; Zhang W; Yan Z
    J Environ Sci (China); 2017 Apr; 54():288-297. PubMed ID: 28391940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.