These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12775081)

  • 1. Comment on "Electrostatic sampler for semivolatile aerosols: chemical artifacts" and "Filter and electrostatic samplers for semivolatile aerosols: physical artifacts".
    Pankow JF
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 May; 37(9):2022; author reply 2023. PubMed ID: 12775081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Filter and electrostatic samplers for semivolatile aerosols: physical artifacts.
    Volckens J; Leith D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Nov; 36(21):4613-7. PubMed ID: 12433172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrostatic sampler for semivolatile aerosols: chemical artifacts.
    Volckens J; Leith D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Nov; 36(21):4608-12. PubMed ID: 12433171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sampling atmospheric carbonaceous aerosols using an integrated organic gas and particle sampler.
    Fan X; Brook JR; Mabury SA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Jul; 37(14):3145-51. PubMed ID: 12901663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sampling atmospheric carbonaceous aerosols using a particle trap impactor/denuder sampler.
    Mader BT; Flagan RC; Seinfeld JH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Dec; 35(24):4857-67. PubMed ID: 11775162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sampling of high amounts of bioaerosols using a high-volume electrostatic field sampler.
    Madsen AM; Sharma AK
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Apr; 52(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 18326871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New experimental methods for the development and evaluation of aerosol samplers.
    Brixey LA; Paik SY; Evans DE; Vincent JH
    J Environ Monit; 2002 Oct; 4(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 12400907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
    Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and application of an aerosol screening model for size-resolved urban aerosols.
    Stanier CO; Lee SR;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (179):3-79. PubMed ID: 25145039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring of urban particulate using an electret-based passive sampler.
    Thorpe A; Hemingway MA; Brown RC
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 1999 Nov; 14(11):750-8. PubMed ID: 10590548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sampling artifacts in active air sampling of semivolatile organic contaminants: Comparing theoretical and measured artifacts and evaluating implications for monitoring networks.
    Melymuk L; Bohlin-Nizzetto P; Prokeš R; Kukučka P; Klánová J
    Environ Pollut; 2016 Oct; 217():97-106. PubMed ID: 26743995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Passive aerosol sampler for particle concentrations and size distributions.
    Whitehead T; Leith D
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Mar; 10(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 18392275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrostatic effects in asbestos sampling. II: Comparison of theory and experiment.
    Baron PA; Deye GJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Feb; 51(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 2305675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aerosol sampling by annular aspiration slots.
    Görner P; Witschger O; Roger F; Wrobel R; Fabriès JF
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Dec; 10(12):1437-47. PubMed ID: 19037485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrostatic effects in asbestos sampling. I: Experimental measurements.
    Baron PA; Deye GJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Feb; 51(2):51-62. PubMed ID: 2407082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chamber evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
    Macher J; Chen B; Rao C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):702-12. PubMed ID: 18720289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of aerosol entrapment and the influence of wind speed, chamber design and foam density on polyurethane foam passive air samplers used for persistent organic pollutants.
    Chaemfa C; Wild E; Davison B; Barber JL; Jones KC
    J Environ Monit; 2009 Jun; 11(6):1135-9. PubMed ID: 19513443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the sampling efficiencies of a range of atmosphere samplers when collecting polymeric diphenylmethane di-isocyanate (MDI) aerosols.
    Hext PM; Booth K; Dharmarajan V; Karoly WJ; Parekh PP; Spence M
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):346-57. PubMed ID: 12746078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.