These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12775666)

  • 21. The role of caries recognition: treatment decisions from bitewing radiographs.
    Mileman PA; van der Weele LT
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):228-33. PubMed ID: 9161175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study.
    Matalon S; Feuerstein O; Kaffe I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 May; 95(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12738956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; van der Stelt PF; Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; van Ginkel FC; Kullendorff B; Hintze H; Larheim TA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of micro-computed tomography for occlusal caries detection: an in vitro study.
    Özkan G; Kanli A; Başeren NM; Arslan U; Tatar İ
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29(1):S1806-83242015000100309. PubMed ID: 26892360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Variations among dentists in radiographic detection of occlusal caries.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB; Fjelltveit A
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 8033190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars.
    Chong MJ; Seow WK; Purdie DM; Cheng E; Wan V
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 13678099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy in radiographic diagnosis: Dutch practitioners and dental caries.
    Mileman PA; van der Weele LT
    J Dent; 1990 Jun; 18(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 2205637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of conventional intra-oral radiography and computer imaging techniques for the detection of proximal surface dental caries.
    Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Aug; 21(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 1397467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro study of laser diode 655 nm diagnosis of occlusal caries.
    Costa AM; Yamaguti PM; De Paula LM; Bezerra AC
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(3):249-53, 233. PubMed ID: 12613306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Prevalence of approximal enamel lesions on bitewing radiographs in cohorts, ages 14 to 23 years].
    Poorterman JH; Aartman IH; Kieft JA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2001 Feb; 108(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 11383279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of wavelet and discrete cosine transform compression of digital radiographs on the detection of subtle proximal caries. ROC analysis.
    Schulze RK; Richter A; d'Hoedt B
    Caries Res; 2008; 42(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 18701823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of smartphones and tablets in radiographic evaluation: accuracy of caries detection on bitewing radiographs.
    Melo CA; Santos MAL; Menezes LS; Santana FS; Melo MFB; Takeshita WM
    Gen Dent; 2021; 69(4):28-34. PubMed ID: 34185665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accurate diagnosis of occlusal carious lesions--a stereo microscope evaluation of clinical diagnosis.
    Grossman ES; Cleaton-Jones PE; Côrtes DF; Daya NP; Parak RB; Fatti LP; Hargreaves JA
    SADJ; 2002 Jun; 57(6):215-20. PubMed ID: 12229076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of experienced dentists in Switzerland after an e-learning program on ICDAS occlusal caries detection.
    Rodrigues JA; de Oliveira RS; Hug I; Neuhaus K; Lussi A
    J Dent Educ; 2013 Aug; 77(8):1086-91. PubMed ID: 23929579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of experience and training on the diagnosis of approximal coronal caries from bitewing radiographs. A Swiss-American comparison.
    Firestone AR; Lussi A; Weems RA; Heaven TJ
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 8042021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of a ranked scoring system to detect occlusal caries in primary molars.
    Dunkley S; Ashley P
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2007 Jul; 17(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 17559454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Geraets WG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10202472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.