These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12776625)

  • 1. Helping patients appeal insurance denials.
    Guglielmo WJ
    Med Econ; 2003 May; 80(9):118-9. PubMed ID: 12776625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is your doctor lying for you?
    Comarow A
    US News World Rep; 1999 Oct; 127(16):66-7. PubMed ID: 10623296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Going to bat for beneficiaries. Advocacy groups pursue denied Medicare claims.
    Rajecki R
    Contemp Longterm Care; 1992 Feb; 15(2):32, 75. PubMed ID: 10117071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When an insurer won't pay.
    Guglielmo WJ
    Med Econ; 2003 May; 80(9):91-2, 98-9. PubMed ID: 12776620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Most initial medical benefit denials reversed on appeal.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1999 Dec; 3(12):184-5. PubMed ID: 11009933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Due process in Medicare appeals: a primer.
    Chiplin AJ
    Issue Brief Cent Medicare Educ; 2002; 3(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 11954573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximizing reimbursement by appealing claim denials.
    Marks JW
    J Med Pract Manage; 2005; 20(4):177-9. PubMed ID: 15779512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medicare identifies claim denials.
    Messina CA
    Mo Med; 1998 May; 95(5):201-3. PubMed ID: 9604663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Receiving payment for patient advocacy.
    Braun FR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jan; 59(1):120. PubMed ID: 11152182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The UR controversy.
    Gemignani J
    Bus Health; 1999 Jul; 17(7):39-40. PubMed ID: 10539170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Medicare appeals process.
    Gottlich V
    Issue Brief Cent Medicare Educ; 2002; 3(4):1-9. PubMed ID: 12117009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CM protocol results in decreased denials.
    Hosp Case Manag; 2009 Jan; 17(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19216360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. HMSA case managers are patient advocates, not UMs.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2005 Jan; 30(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 15709568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3 pillars of a successful denials management program.
    Sanderson B; Hohlweck F; McMilan B
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2008 Sep; 62(9):74-80. PubMed ID: 18782983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precertification, denials and appeals.
    Wax CM
    Fam Pract Manag; 2006 Sep; 13(8):23. PubMed ID: 17022427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Harnessing the power of e-commerce to reduce denials.
    Waymack PM
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2005 Jan; 59(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 15689009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stats & facts. The appeals process: what have we learned?
    Manag Care Interface; 1999 Mar; 12(3):54-5. PubMed ID: 10351408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing medical necessity denials.
    Kroken P
    Radiol Manage; 2006; 28(5):35-7. PubMed ID: 17191545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ruling hits transplant denials.
    Cotton P
    Med World News; 1989 Jun; 30(12):47. PubMed ID: 10293403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precertification, denials and appeals: reducing the hassles.
    Akosa AN
    Fam Pract Manag; 2006 Jun; 13(6):45-8. PubMed ID: 16813121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.