These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12776747)

  • 1. Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs.
    Mayr U; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 May; 29(3):362-72. PubMed ID: 12776747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: tasks or cues?
    Mayr U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):794-9. PubMed ID: 17328375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The surface structure and the deep structure of sequential control: what can we learn from task span switch costs?
    Mayr U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):693-8. PubMed ID: 21037168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults.
    Kray J
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16387284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    Psychol Res; 2010 Sep; 74(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 20037766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 16724782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):343-67. PubMed ID: 16131268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: the role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection.
    Yeung N; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Apr; 29(2):455-69. PubMed ID: 12760628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval?
    Forrest CL; Monsell S; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1002-24. PubMed ID: 24564543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the limits of advance preparation for a task switch: do people prepare all the task some of the time or some of the task all the time?
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Remington RW; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):299-315. PubMed ID: 15826232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval.
    Mayr U; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1124-40. PubMed ID: 11009248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodological and empirical issues when dissociating cue-related from task-related processes in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Forstmann BU; Brass M; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2007 Jul; 71(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 16397813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition.
    Altmann EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is task switching nothing but cue priming? Evidence from ERPs.
    Jost K; Mayr U; Rösler F
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 8(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 18405048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feature Integration and Task Switching: Diminished Switch Costs after Controlling for Stimulus, Response, and Cue Repetitions.
    Schmidt JR; Liefooghe B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151188. PubMed ID: 26964102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm.
    Barton JJ; Greenzang C; Hefter R; Edelman J; Manoach DS
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):76-87. PubMed ID: 16096781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.
    Philipp AM; Jolicoeur P; Falkenstein M; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17983313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural correlates of cue retrieval, task set reconfiguration, and rule mapping in the explicit cue task switching paradigm.
    Travers S; West R
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jul; 45(4):588-601. PubMed ID: 18282198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The costs of crossing paths and switching tasks between audition and vision.
    Murray MM; De Santis L; Thut G; Wylie GR
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Feb; 69(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 18571299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost.
    Arbuthnott KD; Woodward TS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 11901958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.