These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12776747)

  • 21. Individual differences in aging and cognitive control modulate the neural indexes of context updating and maintenance during task switching.
    Adrover-Roig D; Barceló F
    Cortex; 2010 Apr; 46(4):434-50. PubMed ID: 19889406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs".
    Wylie G; Allport A
    Psychol Res; 2000; 63(3-4):212-33. PubMed ID: 11004877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of absolute and relative practice on n-2 repetition costs.
    Scheil J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():65-9. PubMed ID: 26745367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. No-go trials can modulate switch cost by interfering with effects of task preparation.
    Lenartowicz A; Yeung N; Cohen JD
    Psychol Res; 2011 Jan; 75(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 20473686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching.
    Schneider DW
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):762-77. PubMed ID: 26833200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cue type affects preparatory influences on task inhibition.
    Gade M; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():12-8. PubMed ID: 24486802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differential effects of articulatory suppression on cue-switch and task-switch trials in random task cueing with 2:1 mapping.
    Saeki E; Saito S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1599-614. PubMed ID: 22506894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cue-type manipulation dissociates two types of task set inhibition: backward inhibition and competitor rule suppression.
    Regev S; Meiran N
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):625-39. PubMed ID: 25822920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Selective attention to perceptual dimensions and switching between dimensions.
    Meiran N; Dimov E; Ganel T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):191-201. PubMed ID: 22409145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dissociating the components of switch cost using two-to-two cue-task mapping.
    Hydock C; Sohn MH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):903-13. PubMed ID: 21463080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is it harder to switch among a larger set of tasks?
    van 't Wout F; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):363-76. PubMed ID: 25528089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Control and interference in task switching--a review.
    Kiesel A; Steinhauser M; Wendt M; Falkenstein M; Jost K; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Sep; 136(5):849-74. PubMed ID: 20804238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exploring temporal dissipation of attention settings in auditory task switching.
    Koch I; Lawo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 24163154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. You can't always get what you want: the influence of unexpected task constraint on voluntary task switching.
    Weaver SM; Foxe JJ; Shpaner M; Wylie GR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2247-59. PubMed ID: 24916773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neural mechanisms of advance preparation in task switching.
    Gruber O; Karch S; Schlueter EK; Falkai P; Goschke T
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jun; 31(2):887-95. PubMed ID: 16490365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Task-switch costs subsequent to cue-only trials.
    Swainson R; Martin D; Prosser L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1453-1470. PubMed ID: 27174655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exploring individual differences in task switching.
    Li B; Li X; Stoet G; Lages M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():80-95. PubMed ID: 30599293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of cue format and cue transparency on task switching performance.
    Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1346-1369. PubMed ID: 30725390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.