These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1277681)

  • 1. Evaluation of microbial contamination of surgical gloves during actual use.
    Ritter MA; French ML; Eitzen H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1976 Jun; (117):303-6. PubMed ID: 1277681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidence of glove perforations in gastrointestinal surgery and the protective effect of double gloves: a prospective, randomised controlled study.
    Naver LP; Gottrup F
    Eur J Surg; 2000 Apr; 166(4):293-5. PubMed ID: 10817324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective randomized assessment of single versus double-gloving for general surgical procedures.
    Na'aya HU; Madziga AG; Eni UE
    Niger J Med; 2009; 18(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 19485153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Defects in the surgical glove barrier. Single or double gloves].
    Jensen SL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Mar; 165(10):1016-9. PubMed ID: 12645406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of glove donning techniques for the likelihood of gown contamination. An infection control study.
    Newman JB; Bullock M; Goyal R
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2007 Dec; 73(6):765-71. PubMed ID: 18260491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraoperative contamination of synthetic vascular grafts. Effect of glove change before graft implantation. A prospective randomised study.
    Zdanowski Z; Danielsson G; Jonung T; Norgren L; Ribbe E; Thörne J; Kamme C; Schalén C
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2000 Mar; 19(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 10753692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Double gloving as self protection in abdominal surgery.
    Jensen SL; Kristensen B; Fabrin K
    Eur J Surg; 1997 Mar; 163(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 9085056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency of glove perforation and the protective effect of double gloves in gynecological surgery.
    Murta EF; Silva CS; Júnior OR
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2003 Jun; 268(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 12768294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective study of glove perforation in obstetrical and gynecological operations: are we safe enough?
    Malhotra M; Sharma JB; Wadhwa L; Arora R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Aug; 30(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 15238110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of dental glove type on the penetration of liquid through experimental perforation: a spectrophotometric analysis.
    Checchi L; Montebugnoli L; Boschi S; D'Achille C
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Sep; 25(9):647-9. PubMed ID: 7568719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of double gloving on frequency of glove perforations.
    Bennett B; Duff P
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 78(6):1019-22. PubMed ID: 1945200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can the design of glove dispensing boxes influence glove contamination?
    Assadian O; Leaper DJ; Kramer A; Ousey KJ
    J Hosp Infect; 2016 Nov; 94(3):259-262. PubMed ID: 27773471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New advances in electronic devices for hole detection.
    Cox MJ; Bromberg WJ; Zura RD; Foresman PA; Morgan RG; Edlich RF
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 10147452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraoperative glove perforation. A comparative analysis.
    Sebold EJ; Jordan LR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Dec; (297):242-4. PubMed ID: 8242939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of double gloving with a coloured inner pair for immediate detection of operative glove perforations.
    Duron JJ; Keilani K; Elian NG
    Eur J Surg; 1996 Dec; 162(12):941-4. PubMed ID: 9001874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Leak rate of latex gloves after tearing adhesive tape.
    Cork RC; Wood D; Evans B; deLanzac K; Naraghi M
    Am J Anesthesiol; 1995; 22(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 10150352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical significance of holes in gloves for dental use: a spectrophotometric analysis.
    Checchi L; Montebugnoli L; D'Achille C; Boschi S; Conti S
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):599-604. PubMed ID: 1287710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of post-operative complications following wisdom tooth surgery performed with sterile or clean gloves.
    Chiu WK; Cheung LK; Chan HC; Chow LK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 35(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 16154315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized, controlled, double-blind study of the effect of wearing coated pH 5.5 latex gloves compared with standard powder-free latex gloves on skin pH, transepidermal water loss and skin irritation.
    Mirza R; Maani N; Liu C; Kim J; Rehmus W
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Jul; 55(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 16842549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perforation and proteinaceous contamination of dental gloves during prosthodontic treatments.
    Nikawa H; Hamada T; Tamamoto M; Abekura H
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 7748452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.