These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12776815)

  • 1. Inhibition of return using discrimination of location.
    Tsuchida N
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Apr; 96(2):355-69. PubMed ID: 12776815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inhibition of return using location discrimination in two age groups.
    Tsuchida N
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Apr; 100(2):554-8. PubMed ID: 15974365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibitory function in the stimulus-response compatibility task.
    Tsuchida N
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Feb; 100(1):249-57. PubMed ID: 15773715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The interplay of stop signal inhibition and inhibition of return.
    Taylor TL; Ivanoff J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1349-71. PubMed ID: 14578089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cue and target processing modulate the onset of inhibition of return.
    Gabay S; Chica AB; Charras P; Funes MJ; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 21553993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
    Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Notebaert W; Vandierendonck A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Nov; 120(3):307-26. PubMed ID: 15993830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.
    Lupiáñez J; Milliken B; Solano C; Weaver B; Tipper SP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):753-73. PubMed ID: 11548033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects emerge even when the stimulus position is task irrelevant.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jun; 59(6):1021-32. PubMed ID: 16885141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibition of return impairs episodic memory access.
    Massen C; Stegt SJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 May; 60(5):696-707. PubMed ID: 17455077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two Simon tasks with different sources of conflict: an ERP study of motion- and location-based compatibility effects.
    Galashan D; Wittfoth M; Fehr T; Herrmann M
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 18436365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task-dependent exogenous cuing effects depend on cue modality.
    van der Lubbe RH; Havik MM; Bekker EM; Postma A
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Mar; 43(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 16712585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players.
    Nakamoto H; Mori S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():179-88. PubMed ID: 18048011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inhibition of return in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Moritz S; von Mühlenen A
    J Anxiety Disord; 2005; 19(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 15488371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks.
    Ansorge U; Wühr P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1216-35. PubMed ID: 19096944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Set-size effects for identification versus localization depend on the visual search task.
    Busey T; Palmer J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):790-810. PubMed ID: 18665726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.