These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12776815)

  • 21. The effect of age on inhibition of return is independent of non-ocular response inhibition.
    Poliakoff E; Coward RS; Lowe C; O'Boyle DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):387-96. PubMed ID: 16884743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The contribution of general and specific motor inhibitory sets to the so-called auditory inhibition of return.
    Tassinari G; Campara D; Benedetti C; Berlucchi G
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Oct; 146(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 12355281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks.
    Pratt J; Abrams RA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Feb; 25(1):229-42. PubMed ID: 10069033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The impact of multiple irrelevant visual events at the same spatial location on inhibition.
    Visser TA; Barnes D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 19304628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Location vs feature: reaction time reveals dissociation between two visual functions.
    Tanaka Y; Shimojo S
    Vision Res; 1996 Jul; 36(14):2125-40. PubMed ID: 8776479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of spatial distribution of attention during inhibition of return (IOR) on flanker interference in hearing and congenitally deaf people.
    Chen Q; Zhang M; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 1109(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 16859649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The antipointing task: vector inversion is supported by a perceptual estimate of visual space.
    Heath M; Maraj A; Maddigan M; Binsted G
    J Mot Behav; 2009 Oct; 41(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 19460747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recreational use of cocaine eliminates inhibition of return.
    Colzato LS; Hommel B
    Neuropsychology; 2009 Jan; 23(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 19210040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Microsaccadic response during inhibition of return in a target-target paradigm.
    Betta E; Galfano G; Turatto M
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(3):428-36. PubMed ID: 17087989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interlateral asymmetry in the time course of the effect of a peripheral prime stimulus.
    Castro-Barros BA; Righi LL; Grechi G; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 17961895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inhibition of return in aging and Alzheimer's disease: performance as a function of task demands and stimulus timing.
    Langley LK; Fuentes LJ; Hochhalter AK; Brandt J; Overmier JB
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Aug; 23(4):431-46. PubMed ID: 11780944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reaction time inhibition from subliminal cues: is it related to inhibition of return?
    Mele S; Savazzi S; Marzi CA; Berlucchi G
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Feb; 46(3):810-9. PubMed ID: 18206184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Apr; 57(3):539-56. PubMed ID: 15204140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Differential dynamics of spatial and non-spatial stimulus-response compatibility effects: a dual task LRP study.
    Lehle C; Cohen A; Sangals J; Sommer W; Stürmer B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 21030005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inhibition of return from stimulus to response.
    Prime DJ; Ward LM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Apr; 15(4):272-6. PubMed ID: 15043647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Homotopy and heterotopy and the bilateral field advantage in the Dimond paradigm.
    Desjardins S; Braun CM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 16137627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Social inhibition of return.
    Skarratt PA; Cole GG; Kingstone A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 20044064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual rightward spatial bias varies as a function of age.
    Takio F; Koivisto M; Tuominen T; Laukka SJ; Hämäläinen H
    Laterality; 2013; 18(1):44-67. PubMed ID: 23231544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Repetition priming reveals sustained facilitation and transient inhibition in reaction time.
    Tanaka Y; Shimojo S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Aug; 26(4):1421-35. PubMed ID: 10946723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.