143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12777144)
1. TG-51: experience from 150 institutions, common errors, and helpful hints.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF; Ibbott GS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(2):102-11. PubMed ID: 12777144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Almond PR; Biggs PJ; Coursey BM; Hanson WF; Huq MS; Nath R; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1847-70. PubMed ID: 10505874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between TG-51 and TG-21: Calibration of photon and electron beams in water using cylindrical chambers.
Cho SH; Lowenstein JR; Balter PA; Wells NH; Hanson WF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2000; 1(3):108-15. PubMed ID: 11674825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in electron beam dosimetry using two commercial ionization chambers and the TG-21 protocol: another reason to switch to TG-51.
Followill DS; Hanson WF; Ibbott GS; Eglezopoulos LR; Chui CS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 12777147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. TG-21 versus TG-25: a comparison for electrons.
Followill DS; Davis DS; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 1997 Jul; 24(7):1117-21. PubMed ID: 9243474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
Araki F; Kubo HD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The implementation of the AAPM Task Group 21 protocol by the Radiological Physics Center and its implications.
Gastorf RJ; Hanson WF; Shalek RJ; Berkley LW
Med Phys; 1984; 11(4):547-51. PubMed ID: 6434921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modified calibration protocols in electron beam dosimetry: comparison with IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51.
Yulinar C; Assegab MI; Wibowo WE; Pawiro SA
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Jul; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 37442101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MO-D-BRB-02: The Radiological Physics Center's Quality Audit Program: Where Can We Improve?
Followill D; Lowenstein J; Molineu A; Alvarez P; Aguirre J; Kry S; Summers P; Ibbott G
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part21):3866. PubMed ID: 28518233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Determination of absorbed dose to water for high energy photon and electron beams--comparison of different dosimetry protocols].
Zakaria GA; Schütte W
Z Med Phys; 2003; 13(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 14732959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of radiotherapy beams.
Huq MS; Nath R
Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 1901129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams for radiotherapy using AAPM 1983 and IAEA 1987 dosimetry protocols.
Huq MS; Agostinelli AG; Nath R
Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):293-8. PubMed ID: 8497213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
