These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12778542)

  • 1. The additive genetic variance after bottlenecks is affected by the number of loci involved in epistatic interactions.
    Naciri-Graven Y; Goudet J
    Evolution; 2003 Apr; 57(4):706-16. PubMed ID: 12778542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis.
    Barton NH; Turelli M
    Evolution; 2004 Oct; 58(10):2111-32. PubMed ID: 15562679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of epistasis on the excess of the additive and nonadditive variances after population bottlenecks.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    Evolution; 2002 May; 56(5):865-76. PubMed ID: 12093023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Significance of linkage disequilibrium and epistasis on genetic variances in noninbred and inbred populations.
    Viana JMS; Garcia AAF
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):286. PubMed ID: 35397494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of genetic drift on the variance/covariance components generated by multilocus additive x additive epistatic systems.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Mar; 239(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 16242726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epistasis and the conversion of non-additive to additive genetic variance at population bottlenecks.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2000 Aug; 58(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 10944475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epistasis and the temporal change in the additive variance-covariance matrix induced by drift.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    Evolution; 2004 Aug; 58(8):1655-63. PubMed ID: 15446420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Will population bottlenecks and multilocus epistasis increase additive genetic variance?
    Turelli M; Barton NH
    Evolution; 2006 Sep; 60(9):1763-76. PubMed ID: 17089962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
    Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dominance Can Increase Genetic Variance After a Population Bottleneck: A Synthesis of the Theoretical and Empirical Evidence.
    Mularo AJ; Bernal XE; DeWoody JA
    J Hered; 2022 Jul; 113(3):257-271. PubMed ID: 35143665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EPISTASIS AS A SOURCE OF INCREASED ADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE AT POPULATION BOTTLENECKS.
    Cheverud JM; Routman EJ
    Evolution; 1996 Jun; 50(3):1042-1051. PubMed ID: 28565298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of non-additive genetic interactions on selection in multi-locus genetic models.
    Hallander J; Waldmann P
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Jun; 98(6):349-59. PubMed ID: 17327874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orthogonal Estimates of Variances for Additive, Dominance, and Epistatic Effects in Populations.
    Vitezica ZG; Legarra A; Toro MA; Varona L
    Genetics; 2017 Jul; 206(3):1297-1307. PubMed ID: 28522540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-locus drift with sex chromosomes: the partitioning and conversion of variance in subdivided populations.
    Whitlock MC
    Theor Popul Biol; 1995 Aug; 48(1):44-64. PubMed ID: 7660328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying quantitative trait locus by genetic background interactions in association studies.
    Jannink JL
    Genetics; 2007 May; 176(1):553-61. PubMed ID: 17179077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contribution of genetic effects to genetic variance components with epistasis and linkage disequilibrium.
    Wang T; Zeng ZB
    BMC Genet; 2009 Sep; 10():52. PubMed ID: 19732450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of neutral nonadditive gene action on the quantitative index of population divergence.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    Genetics; 2003 Aug; 164(4):1627-33. PubMed ID: 12930766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of gene interaction on complex trait variation with multilocus models.
    Mäki-Tanila A; Hill WG
    Genetics; 2014 Sep; 198(1):355-67. PubMed ID: 24990992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expected influence of linkage disequilibrium on genetic variance caused by dominance and epistasis on quantitative traits.
    Hill WG; Mäki-Tanila A
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Apr; 132(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 25823842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Epistasis Is a Major Determinant of the Additive Genetic Variance in Mimulus guttatus.
    Monnahan PJ; Kelly JK
    PLoS Genet; 2015 May; 11(5):e1005201. PubMed ID: 25946702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.