179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12778557)
1. Genetic benefits of a female mating preference in gray tree frogs are context-dependent.
Welch AM
Evolution; 2003 Apr; 57(4):883-93. PubMed ID: 12778557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs.
Welch AM; Semlitsch RD; Gerhardt HC
Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5371):1928-30. PubMed ID: 9632389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
Gerhardt HC
Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multivariate analysis of genetic variation in the advertisement call of the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor.
Welch AM; Smith MJ; Gerhardt HC
Evolution; 2014 Jun; 68(6):1629-39. PubMed ID: 24621402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calling is an honest indicator of paternal genetic quality in poison frogs.
Forsman A; Hagman M
Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):2148-57. PubMed ID: 17133871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mating vocalizations of female frogs: control and evolutionary mechanisms.
Emerson SB; Boyd SK
Brain Behav Evol; 1999; 53(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 10343085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Paternal genetic effects on offspring fitness are context dependent within the extrapair mating system of a socially monogamous passerine.
Schmoll T; Dietrich V; Winkel W; Epplen JT; Schurr F; Lubjuhn T
Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):645-57. PubMed ID: 15856706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sexual selection in female perceptual space: how female túngara frogs perceive and respond to complex population variation in acoustic mating signals.
Ryan MJ; Rand AS
Evolution; 2003 Nov; 57(11):2608-18. PubMed ID: 14686535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selective phonotaxis by males in the Majorcan midwife toad.
Bush SL; Dyson ML; Halliday TR
Proc Biol Sci; 1996 Jul; 263(1372):913-7. PubMed ID: 8760493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive character displacement in the acoustic communication system of green tree frogs (Hyla cinerea).
Höbel G; Gerhardt HC
Evolution; 2003 Apr; 57(4):894-904. PubMed ID: 12778558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preferences based on spectral differences in acoustic signals in four species of treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae).
Gerhardt HC; Martínez-Rivera CC; Schwartz JJ; Marshall VT; Murphy CG
J Exp Biol; 2007 Sep; 210(Pt 17):2990-8. PubMed ID: 17704074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The breeding behaviour, advertisement call and tadpole of Limnonectes dabanus (Anura: Dicroglossidae).
Rowley JJ; Le DT; Hoang HD; Altig R
Zootaxa; 2014 Nov; 3881(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 25543630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Not so cryptic-differences between mating calls of
Lukanov S
PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17574. PubMed ID: 38948235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hybrid female mate choice as a species isolating mechanism: environment matters.
Schmidt EM; Pfennig KS
J Evol Biol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):865-9. PubMed ID: 26717048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Task differences confound sex differences in receiver permissiveness in túngara frogs.
Bernal XE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Apr; 276(1660):1323-9. PubMed ID: 19141428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Glucocorticoid-Mediated Changes in Male Green Treefrog Vocalizations Alter Attractiveness to Females.
Leary CJ; Crocker-Buta S; Holloway A; Kennedy JGC
Integr Comp Biol; 2021 Jul; 61(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33940612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trade-offs and upper limits to signal performance during close-range vocal competition in gray tree frogs hyla versicolor.
Reichert MS; Gerhardt HC
Am Nat; 2012 Oct; 180(4):425-37. PubMed ID: 22976007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The separate and combined effects of harmonic structure, phase, and FM on female preferences in the barking treefrog (Hyla gratiosa).
Bodnar DA
J Comp Physiol A; 1996 Feb; 178(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 8592302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Facultative mate choice drives adaptive hybridization.
Pfennig KS
Science; 2007 Nov; 318(5852):965-7. PubMed ID: 17991861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complexity increases working memory for mating signals.
Akre KL; Ryan MJ
Curr Biol; 2010 Mar; 20(6):502-5. PubMed ID: 20206525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
