These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12778927)

  • 1. Redefining family: should lesbians have access to assisted reproduction?
    Dower T
    Melb Univ Law Rev; 2001 Aug; 25(2):466-80. PubMed ID: 12778927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assisted reproductive technologies and equity of access issues.
    Peterson MM
    J Med Ethics; 2005 May; 31(5):280-5. PubMed ID: 15863687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limiting access to assisted reproduction: JM v. QFG.
    Stuhmcke A
    Aust J Fam Law; 2002 Dec; 16(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 17058334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Where does a man stand on issues of assisted reproduction, surrogacy, artificial insemination within lesbian relationships and posthumous conception?
    Beem P
    Aust J Fam Law; 2004 Apr; 18(1):41-62. PubMed ID: 17058336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What does it mean for youngsters to grow up in a lesbian family created by means of donor insemination?
    Vanfraussen K; Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I; Brewaeys A
    J Reprod Infant Psychol; 2002 Nov; 20(4):237-52. PubMed ID: 16180285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lesbian families and family functioning: an overview.
    Bos HM; van Balen F; van den Boom DC
    Patient Educ Couns; 2005 Dec; 59(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 16326265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Problems with the regulation of assisted reproductive technology: a clinician's perspective.
    Baker HW
    J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):457-69. PubMed ID: 12194477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted reproductive technologies: professional and legal restrictions in Australian clinics.
    Petersen K; Baker HW; Pitts M; Thorpe R
    J Law Med; 2005 Feb; 12(3):373-85. PubMed ID: 15754559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The regulation of in-vitro fertilisation: social norms and discrimination.
    Porter D
    E Law; 1997 Sep; 4(3):E4. PubMed ID: 16900613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First amendment -- California Supreme Court holds that free exercise of religion does not give fertility doctors right to deny treatment to lesbians. -- North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. San Diego County Superior Court, 189 P.3d 959 (Cal. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Dec; 122(2):787-94. PubMed ID: 19130682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Just Molly and me, and donor makes three: lesbian motherhood in the age of assisted reproductive technology.
    Ehrensaft D
    J Lesbian Stud; 2008; 12(2-3):161-78. PubMed ID: 19042730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New assisted reproductive technology laws in Victoria: a genuine overhaul or just cut and paste?
    Thorpe R; Petersen K; Pitts MK; Baker HW
    J Law Med; 2011 Jun; 18(4):835-50. PubMed ID: 21774278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The experiences of Australian lesbian couples becoming parents: deciding, searching and birthing.
    Chapman R; Wardrop J; Zappia T; Watkins R; Shields L
    J Clin Nurs; 2012 Jul; 21(13-14):1878-85. PubMed ID: 22554189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How well are lesbians treated in UK fertility clinics?
    Priddle H
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2015 Sep; 18(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 26083621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Access to Assisted Reproductive Technologies, surrogacy, same sex couple parenting].
    Belaisch Allart J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Aug; 40 Suppl 1():3-7. PubMed ID: 23141591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Access to assisted reproductive technology for cancer patients in Australia.
    McConnell R; Stankiewicz M; Koczwara B
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2011 Jun; 7(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 21585691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing Non-Medical Sex Selection and Saviour Sibling Selection in the Case of JS and LS v Patient Review Panel: Beyond the Welfare of the Child?
    Smith MK; Taylor-Sands M
    J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Mar; 15(1):139-153. PubMed ID: 29396799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regulation, consultation and divergent community views: the case of access to ART by lesbian and single women.
    Cannold L; Gillam L
    J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 12194480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Access to fertility treatment by gays, lesbians, and unmarried persons.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1333-5. PubMed ID: 17070191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Getting beyond the welfare of the child in assisted reproduction.
    Solberg B
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):373-6. PubMed ID: 19482982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.