These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12778930)

  • 1. Genetic secrets and the family.
    Bell D; Bennett B
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(2):130-61. PubMed ID: 12778930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic secrets and the family: a response to Bell and Bennett.
    Skene L
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 12778931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Double Helix: Applying an Ethic of Care to the Duty to Warn Genetic Relatives of Genetic Information.
    Weaver M
    Bioethics; 2016 Mar; 30(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 26194147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What should the law say about disclosure of genetic information to relatives?
    Clayton EW
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(2):373-90. PubMed ID: 16281334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disclosing genetic information to at-risk relatives: new Australian privacy principles, but uniformity still elusive.
    Otlowski MF
    Med J Aust; 2015 Apr; 202(6):335-7. PubMed ID: 25832164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetics and patients' rights: where are the limits?
    Laurie GT
    Med Law Int; 2000; 5(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 15040376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disclosure to genetic relatives without consent - Australian genetic professionals' awareness of the health privacy law.
    Meggiolaro N; Barlow-Stewart K; Dunlop K; Newson AJ; Fleming J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):13. PubMed ID: 32019532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The argument against a physician's duty to warn for genetic diseases: the conflicts created by Safer v. Estate of Pack.
    Liang A
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(2):437-53. PubMed ID: 16281336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The most personal information of all: an appraisal of genetic privacy in the shadow of the Human Genome Project.
    Laurie GT
    Int J Law Policy Family; 1996; 10(1):74-101. PubMed ID: 16883663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic information: what is the patient's family entitled to know?
    Abbott K
    J Nurs Law; 1999 Aug; 6(2):15-21. PubMed ID: 14696641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disclosure of genetic information to at-risk relatives: recent amendments to the Privacy Act 1988 (Cwlth).
    Otlowski MF
    Med J Aust; 2007 Oct; 187(7):398-9. PubMed ID: 17908004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic privacy: the potential for genetic discrimination in insurance.
    Jensen P
    Law Rev; 1999 Apr; 29(2):347-69. PubMed ID: 12741371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic test results and the duty to disclose: can medical researchers control liability?
    Furman RL
    Seattle Univ Law Rev; 1999; 23(2):391-429. PubMed ID: 12449928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic testing without consent: the implications of the new Human Tissue Act 2004.
    Lucassen A; Kaye J
    J Med Ethics; 2006 Dec; 32(12):690-2. PubMed ID: 17145906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic testing: do healthcare professionals have a duty to tell a patient's family members that they may be at risk?
    Marta MR
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 1999; 19(3):26-38. PubMed ID: 10538434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. It's arrived! Relational Autonomy Comes to Court: ABC v ST George's Healthcare NHS Trust [2017] EWCA 336.
    Gilbar R; Foster C
    Med Law Rev; 2018 Feb; 26(1):125-133. PubMed ID: 29045720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rethinking medical confidentiality: the impact of genetics.
    Wachbroit R
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1391-410. PubMed ID: 11657043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A physician's duty to warn family members of genetic risks: limiting the importance of Tarasoff.
    Russell S
    J Biolaw Bus; 2003; 6(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 15239180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidence matters: the rise and fall of informational autonomy in medical law.
    Case P
    Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(2):208-36. PubMed ID: 15085818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mother still knows best: cancer-related gene mutations, familial privacy, and a physician's duty to warn.
    Brownrigg A
    Fordham Urban Law J; 1999 Jan; 26(2):247-79. PubMed ID: 16437785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.