These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1277931)

  • 1. Doppler ultrasonic assessment of aortic stenosis by analysis of axillary arterial blood velocity upstroke time.
    Barnes RW; Rittenhouse EA; Miller EV
    Chest; 1976 Jul; 70(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 1277931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Value and limitations of Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of aortic stenosis: a statistical analysis of 70 consecutive patients.
    Panidis IP; Mintz GS; Ross J
    Am Heart J; 1986 Jul; 112(1):150-8. PubMed ID: 3524170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Severity of aortic stenosis assessed by Doppler techniques].
    Nakamura K; Shiina T; Satomi G; Sakai K; Tamura K; Matsumura K; Umemura J; Magosaki N; Koyanagi H; Hirosawa K
    J Cardiol; 1987 Dec; 17(4):807-16. PubMed ID: 3333519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging.
    Eichenberger AC; Jenni R; von Schulthess GK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 May; 160(5):971-7. PubMed ID: 8470612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity: role of contrast echocardiography in comparison with conventional echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.
    Almeida AG; Sargento L; Gabriel HM; da Costa JM; Morais J; Madeira F; David C; Oliveira J; da Cunha JC; Vagueiro MC
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2002 May; 21(5):555-72. PubMed ID: 12174519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.
    Hatle L; Angelsen BA; Tromsdal A
    Br Heart J; 1980 Mar; 43(3):284-92. PubMed ID: 7437175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Noninvasive quantification and classification of the severity of aortic stenosis using Doppler echocardiography].
    Schmalz A; Erbel R; Wittlich N; Mohr-Kahaly S; Meyer J
    Z Kardiol; 1992 Nov; 81(11):619-26. PubMed ID: 1471399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Determination of the transaortic valve gradient in aortic stenosis by continuous Doppler echocardiography].
    Tomov I; Savova A; Kŭtova Ts
    Vutr Boles; 1989; 28(2):35-40. PubMed ID: 2763522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of new and old Doppler echocardiographic indexes of the severity of aortic stenosis in patients with a low cardiac output.
    Antonini-Canterin F; Huang G; Cervesato E; Faggiano P; Pavan D; Piazza R; Burelli C; Cassin M; Macor F; Zardo F; Nicolosi GL
    Ital Heart J; 2002 Apr; 3(4):248-55. PubMed ID: 12025374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Continuous emission Doppler study with spectrum analysis in the evaluation of aortic stenosis in adults. Apropos of 30 cases].
    Dieudonńe P; De Smet JM; Stoupel E; Joris M; Vandermoten P; Le Clerc JL
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1987 Mar; 80(3):328-33. PubMed ID: 3113355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-invasive diagnosis and assessment of aortic valve disease and evaluation of aortic prosthesis function using echo pulsed Doppler velocimetry.
    Veyrat C; Cholot N; Abitbol G; Kalmanson D
    Br Heart J; 1980 Apr; 43(4):393-413. PubMed ID: 7397041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound.
    Berger M; Berdoff RL; Gallerstein PE; Goldberg E
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 Jan; 3(1):150-6. PubMed ID: 6690544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Value of ejection fraction/velocity ratio in the prognostic stratification of patients with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis.
    Antonini-Canterin F; Di Nora C; Cervesato E; Zito C; Carerj S; Ravasel A; Cosei I; Popescu AC; Popescu BA
    Echocardiography; 2018 Dec; 35(12):1909-1914. PubMed ID: 30376590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effect of aortic valve replacent for aortic stenosis on cervical arterial blood flow].
    Cardon C; Chenon D; Meimoun P; Mihaileanu S; Latremouille C; Fabiani JN
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2001 Feb; 94(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 11265547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation].
    Tei C; Kisanuki A; Arikawa K; Otsuji Y; Arima S; Kashima T; Tanaka H; Kushitani M; Shah PM
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Mar; 15(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 4067338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding the catheter-Doppler pressure gradient discrepancy in aortic stenosis.
    Pai RG; Pai AD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 May; 20(3):299-300. PubMed ID: 21714420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Non-invasive evaluation of pressure gradients in aortic stenosis using Doppler ultrasound].
    Hoffmann A; Amann FW; Burckhardt D
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1982 Nov; 112(45):1597-600. PubMed ID: 7156955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Doppler derived aortic valve resistance in aortic stenosis: its hemodynamic validation.
    Ho PP; Pauls GL; Lamberton DF; Portnoff JS; Pai RG; Shah PM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 May; 3(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 8087265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.
    Burwash IG; Dickinson A; Teskey RJ; Tam JW; Chan KL
    Can J Cardiol; 2000 Aug; 16(8):985-92. PubMed ID: 10978934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Quantitative evaluation of aortic stenosis using continuous wave Doppler].
    Zhu WL
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 1989 Feb; 17(1):7-9, 61. PubMed ID: 2766948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.