BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12780360)

  • 1. Are scratchcards addictive? The prevalence of pathological scratchcard gambling among adult scratchcard buyers in the Netherlands.
    DeFuentes-Merillas L; Koeter MW; Bethlehem J; Schippers GM; van den Brink W
    Addiction; 2003 Jun; 98(6):725-31. PubMed ID: 12780360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal stability of pathological scratchcard gambling among adult scratchcard buyers two years later.
    DeFuentes-Merillas L; Koeter MW; Schippers GM; van den Brink W
    Addiction; 2004 Jan; 99(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 14678070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scratchcard gambling among adolescent males.
    Griffiths M
    J Gambl Stud; 2000; 16(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 14634322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.
    Tang CS; Wu AM; Tang JY; Yan EC
    J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 19680794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Psychopathology in online pathological gamblers: a preliminary study].
    Barrault S; Varescon I
    Encephale; 2012 Apr; 38(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 22516274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The acquisition, development and maintenance of lottery and scratchcard gambling in adolescence.
    Wood RT; Griffiths MD
    J Adolesc; 1998 Jun; 21(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 9657894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Problematic and pathologic gambling in Hungary: the Hungarian version and use of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS-HU)].
    Gyollai A; Urbán R; Kun B; Paksi B; Arnold P; Balázs H; Kökönyei G; Oláh A; Demetrovics Z
    Psychiatr Hung; 2011; 26(4):230-40. PubMed ID: 22058255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lifetime prevalence estimates of pathological gambling in New Zealand.
    Volberg RA; Abbott MW
    Int J Epidemiol; 1994 Oct; 23(5):976-83. PubMed ID: 7860178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
    Stinchfield R
    Addict Behav; 2002; 27(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11800216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of treatment-seeking pathological gamblers based on preferred gambling activity.
    Petry NM
    Addiction; 2003 May; 98(5):645-55. PubMed ID: 12751982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons between the South Oaks Gambling Screen and a DSM-IV-based interview in a community survey of problem gambling.
    Cox BJ; Enns MW; Michaud V
    Can J Psychiatry; 2004 Apr; 49(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 15147024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using a Rasch model to examine the utility of the South Oaks Gambling Screen across clinical and community samples.
    Strong DR; Lesieur HR; Breen RB; Stinchfield R; Lejuez CW
    Addict Behav; 2004 May; 29(3):465-81. PubMed ID: 15050667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gambling and problem gambling in The Netherlands.
    Goudriaan AE
    Addiction; 2014 Jul; 109(7):1066-71. PubMed ID: 23742239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An assessment of the psychometric properties of Lithuanian versions of DSM-IV-MR-J and SOGS-RA.
    Skokauskas N; Burba B; Freedman D
    J Gambl Stud; 2009 Jun; 25(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 19241149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence rates of gambling problems in Montreal, Canada: a look at old adults and the role of passion.
    Philippe F; Vallerand RJ
    J Gambl Stud; 2007 Sep; 23(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 17431750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Descriptive features of Turkish pathological gamblers.
    Duvarci I; Varan A
    Scand J Psychol; 2000 Sep; 41(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 11041308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Pathological gambling and internet addiction among nursing students: a pilot study].
    Comparcini D; Simonetti V; Galli F; Buccoliero D; Palombelli E; Senede G; Cicolini G
    Prof Inferm; 2018; 71(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 29790325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the South Oaks Gambling Screen with DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria: results from a diverse community sample of gamblers.
    Goodie AS; MacKillop J; Miller JD; Fortune EE; Maples J; Lance CE; Campbell WK
    Assessment; 2013 Oct; 20(5):523-31. PubMed ID: 23946283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical measures vs. perceived gambling severity among youth: why adolescent problem gamblers fail to seek treatment.
    Hardoon K; Derevensky JL; Gupta R
    Addict Behav; 2003 Jul; 28(5):933-46. PubMed ID: 12788266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Reliability and validity of the modified Japanese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)].
    Kido M; Shimazaki T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Feb; 77(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 17447464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.