BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12782593)

  • 1. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for genome-wide screening of DNA copy number in bladder tumors.
    Veltman JA; Fridlyand J; Pejavar S; Olshen AB; Korkola JE; DeVries S; Carroll P; Kuo WL; Pinkel D; Albertson D; Cordon-Cardo C; Jain AN; Waldman FM
    Cancer Res; 2003 Jun; 63(11):2872-80. PubMed ID: 12782593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-resolution analysis of genomic copy number alterations in bladder cancer by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Hurst CD; Fiegler H; Carr P; Williams S; Carter NP; Knowles MA
    Oncogene; 2004 Mar; 23(12):2250-63. PubMed ID: 14968109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bladder cancer stage and outcome by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Blaveri E; Brewer JL; Roydasgupta R; Fridlyand J; DeVries S; Koppie T; Pejavar S; Mehta K; Carroll P; Simko JP; Waldman FM
    Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Oct; 11(19 Pt 1):7012-22. PubMed ID: 16203795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.
    Kloth JN; Oosting J; van Wezel T; Szuhai K; Knijnenburg J; Gorter A; Kenter GG; Fleuren GJ; Jordanova ES
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Feb; 8():53. PubMed ID: 17311676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-resolution genomic profiles of breast cancer cell lines assessed by tiling BAC array comparative genomic hybridization.
    Jönsson G; Staaf J; Olsson E; Heidenblad M; Vallon-Christersson J; Osoegawa K; de Jong P; Oredsson S; Ringnér M; Höglund M; Borg A
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2007 Jun; 46(6):543-58. PubMed ID: 17334996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic profiling of malignant pleural mesothelioma with array-based comparative genomic hybridization shows frequent non-random chromosomal alteration regions including JUN amplification on 1p32.
    Taniguchi T; Karnan S; Fukui T; Yokoyama T; Tagawa H; Yokoi K; Ueda Y; Mitsudomi T; Horio Y; Hida T; Yatabe Y; Seto M; Sekido Y
    Cancer Sci; 2007 Mar; 98(3):438-46. PubMed ID: 17270034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Analysis of genomic copy number alterations of malignant lymphomas and its application for diagnosis].
    Tagawa H
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2007 Jul; 34(7):975-82. PubMed ID: 17637530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic classification of lung adenocarcinoma based on array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis: its association with clinicopathologic features.
    Shibata T; Uryu S; Kokubu A; Hosoda F; Ohki M; Sakiyama T; Matsuno Y; Tsuchiya R; Kanai Y; Kondo T; Imoto I; Inazawa J; Hirohashi S
    Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Sep; 11(17):6177-85. PubMed ID: 16144918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic signatures of chromosomal instability and osteosarcoma progression detected by high resolution array CGH and interphase FISH.
    Selvarajah S; Yoshimoto M; Ludkovski O; Park PC; Bayani J; Thorner P; Maire G; Squire JA; Zielenska M
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2008; 122(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 18931480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-resolution mapping of amplifications and deletions in pediatric osteosarcoma by use of CGH analysis of cDNA microarrays.
    Squire JA; Pei J; Marrano P; Beheshti B; Bayani J; Lim G; Moldovan L; Zielenska M
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Nov; 38(3):215-25. PubMed ID: 14506695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive whole genome array CGH profiling of mantle cell lymphoma model genomes.
    de Leeuw RJ; Davies JJ; Rosenwald A; Bebb G; Gascoyne RD; Dyer MJ; Staudt LM; Martinez-Climent JA; Lam WL
    Hum Mol Genet; 2004 Sep; 13(17):1827-37. PubMed ID: 15229187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of uterine leiomyosarcoma.
    Cho YL; Bae S; Koo MS; Kim KM; Chun HJ; Kim CK; Ro DY; Kim JH; Lee CH; Kim YW; Ahn WS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3):545-51. PubMed ID: 16125217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can bladder adenocarcinomas be distinguished from schistosomiasis-associated bladder cancers by using array comparative genomic hybridization analysis?
    Vauhkonen H; Böhling T; Eissa S; Shoman S; Knuutila S
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2007 Sep; 177(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 17854674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Across array comparative genomic hybridization: a strategy to reduce reference channel hybridizations.
    Buffart TE; Israeli D; Tijssen M; Vosse SJ; Mrsić A; Meijer GA; Ylstra B
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2008 Nov; 47(11):994-1004. PubMed ID: 18663753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DNA copy-number analysis of the 22q11 deletion-syndrome region using array-CGH with genomic and PCR-based targets.
    Mantripragada KK; Tapia-Páez I; Blennow E; Nilsson P; Wedell A; Dumanski JP
    Int J Mol Med; 2004 Feb; 13(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 14719134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chromosomal aberrations in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas in Norwegian and Sudanese populations by array comparative genomic hybridization.
    Roman E; Meza-Zepeda LA; Kresse SH; Myklebost O; Vasstrand EN; Ibrahim SO
    Oncol Rep; 2008 Oct; 20(4):825-43. PubMed ID: 18813824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genome-wide-array-based comparative genomic hybridization reveals genetic homogeneity and frequent copy number increases encompassing CCNE1 in fallopian tube carcinoma.
    Snijders AM; Nowee ME; Fridlyand J; Piek JM; Dorsman JC; Jain AN; Pinkel D; van Diest PJ; Verheijen RH; Albertson DG
    Oncogene; 2003 Jul; 22(27):4281-6. PubMed ID: 12833150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy number alterations and gene expression in gastric cancer.
    Tsukamoto Y; Uchida T; Karnan S; Noguchi T; Nguyen LT; Tanigawa M; Takeuchi I; Matsuura K; Hijiya N; Nakada C; Kishida T; Kawahara K; Ito H; Murakami K; Fujioka T; Seto M; Moriyama M
    J Pathol; 2008 Dec; 216(4):471-82. PubMed ID: 18798223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molecular characterization of breast cancer with high-resolution oligonucleotide comparative genomic hybridization array.
    Andre F; Job B; Dessen P; Tordai A; Michiels S; Liedtke C; Richon C; Yan K; Wang B; Vassal G; Delaloge S; Hortobagyi GN; Symmans WF; Lazar V; Pusztai L
    Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Jan; 15(2):441-51. PubMed ID: 19147748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.