These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Current trends in otoplasty. Petersson RS; Friedman O Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 16(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 18626255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Otoplasty: results after anterior versus posterior approach]. Echarri San Martín R; Hernando Cuñado M; Montojo Woodeson J; Plaza Mayor G Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2011; 62(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 21295762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Correction of the protruding ear with a modified anterior scoring technique. Lazaridis N; Tilaveridis I; Dimitrakopoulos I; Karakasis D J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Mar; 56(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 9496841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Otoplasty using the postauricular skin flap technique. Romo T; Sclafani AP; Shapiro AL Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Oct; 120(10):1146-50. PubMed ID: 7917198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Biomechanical evaluation of surgical correction of prominent ear. Miyamoto J; Nagasao T; Tamaki T; Nakajima T Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Mar; 123(3):889-896. PubMed ID: 19319052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Pre- and postoperative management in otoplasty. Kotler HS; Robertson K; Tardy ME Facial Plast Surg; 1994 Jul; 10(3):244-54. PubMed ID: 7835729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Otoplasty. Templer J; Thomas JR; Davis WE Ear Nose Throat J; 1981 Feb; 60(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 7227265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparative study of the effectiveness of the surgical technique with and without preservation of the conchal cartilage in otoplasty through the measure of the cephalo-auricular and scapho-conchal angles. Soares CMC; Nassif FDJM; Dranka D; Becker RV; Hurtado JM; Freitas RDS Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2023; 89(3):410-416. PubMed ID: 36754673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Posterior Perichondrioadipodermal flap: A Versatile Option for Revision Otoplasty. Ersen B Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Jan; 84(1):20-23. PubMed ID: 31232815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of otoplasty results using different types of suturing techniques. Foustanos A; Messinis L; Panagiotopoulos K Acta Chir Plast; 2012; 54(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 23170940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Complications following correction of prominent ears: an audit review of 122 cases. Jeffery SL Br J Plast Surg; 1999 Oct; 52(7):588-90. PubMed ID: 10658116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Otoplasty using a spherical metal head dermabrador to form a retroauricular furrow: five-year results. Pilz S; Hintringer T; Bauer M Aesthetic Plast Surg; 1995; 19(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 7900561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Primary cardiac tumours: eighteen years of surgical experience on 21 patients. Piazza N; Chughtai T; Toledano K; Sampalis J; Liao C; Morin JF Can J Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 20(14):1443-8. PubMed ID: 15614339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Mattress suture otoplasty: a histopathologic study. Bohsali I Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon; 1973 Feb; 52(2):57-9. PubMed ID: 4567374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Otoplasty: An alternative approach to management of the deep conchal bowl. Sie KC; Ou H Laryngoscope; 2006 Nov; 116(11):2092-4. PubMed ID: 17075414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]