336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12783134)
1. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of 3-dimensional turbo spin echo and single-shot turbo spin echo with ERCP.
Chen RC; Lin KY; Lii JM; Yang MT; Chen WT; Tu HY; Wang CS
J Formos Med Assoc; 2003 Mar; 102(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 12783134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP.
Lomas DJ; Bearcroft PW; Gimson AE
Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(7):1411-7. PubMed ID: 10460385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Single shot MRI cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with a "fast acquisition spin echo" sequence (FASE). Replacement of ERCP?].
Schulte B; Beyer D; Wedekind G; Meuser W
Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 9538925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pancreaticobiliary diseases. Comparison of 2D single-shot turbo spin-echo MR cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Arslan A; Geitung JT; Viktil E; Abdelnoor M; Osnes M
Acta Radiol; 2000 Nov; 41(6):621-6. PubMed ID: 11092486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique.
Vitellas KM; Keogan MT; Spritzer CE; Nelson RC
Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):939-57; quiz 1107-8, 1112. PubMed ID: 10903685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison between respiratory-triggered turbo spin echo and breath hold single-shot turbo spin echo sequences.
Papanikolaou N; Karantanas AH; Heracleous E; Costa JC; Gourtsoyiannis N
Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Nov; 17(9):1255-60. PubMed ID: 10576710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic findings.
Yeh TS; Jan YY; Tseng JH; Chiu CT; Chen TC; Hwang TL; Chen MF
Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Feb; 95(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 10685746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cholangiopancreatography with magnetic resonance. Clinical use of a new "inversion-recovery" sequence].
Liessi G; Cesari S; Dell'Antonio C; Avventi P; Spaliviero B; Butini R; Pavanello M
Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 8975311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography.
Alcaraz MJ; De la Morena EJ; Polo A; Ramos A; De la Cal MA; González Mandly A
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2000 Jul; 92(7):427-38. PubMed ID: 11026760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): diagnostic usefulness].
Pamos S; Rivera P; Canelles P; Quiles F; Ortí E; Cuquerella J; Martínez V; Medina E
Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1998 Apr; 21(4):174-80. PubMed ID: 9633177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro and clinical studies of image acquisition in breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography: single-shot projection technique versus multislice technique.
Yamashita Y; Abe Y; Tang Y; Urata J; Sumi S; Takahashi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1449-54. PubMed ID: 9168706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract disease.
Varghese JC; Farrell MA; Courtney G; Osborne H; Murray FE; Lee MJ
Clin Radiol; 1999 Aug; 54(8):513-20. PubMed ID: 10484218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Weber C; Kuhlencordt R; Grotelueschen R; Wedegaertner U; Ang TL; Adam G; Soehendra N; Seitz U
Endoscopy; 2008 Sep; 40(9):739-45. PubMed ID: 18698533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought.
Aydelotte JD; Ali J; Huynh PT; Coopwood TB; Uecker JM; Brown CV
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 26047762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Malignant obstructive jaundice: comparison of MRCP and ERCP in the evaluation of distal lesions.
Di Cesare E; Puglielli E; Michelini O; Pistoi MA; Lombardi L; Rossi M; Barile A; Masciocchi C
Radiol Med; 2003; 105(5-6):445-53. PubMed ID: 12949455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.
Griffin N; Wastle ML; Dunn WK; Ryder SD; Beckingham IJ
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2003 Jul; 15(7):809-13. PubMed ID: 12811312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne DH; Lee MJ
Clin Radiol; 2000 Jan; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10650107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at 0.5 T: technique optimisation and preliminary results.
Pavone P; Laghi A; Catalano C; Broglia L; Messina A; Scipioni A; Di Girolamo M; Passariello R
Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 8797971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
