These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12783812)

  • 1. Water quality monitoring in membrane filtration systems.
    Abogrean EM; Boerlage SF; Kennedy MD; El-Azizi IM; Galjaard G; Schippers JS
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Mar; 984():85-96. PubMed ID: 12783812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
    Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of coagulation on fouling potential and removal of algal organic matter in ultrafiltration pretreatment to seawater reverse osmosis.
    Alizadeh Tabatabai SA; Schippers JC; Kennedy MD
    Water Res; 2014 Aug; 59():283-94. PubMed ID: 24810744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New parameter for monitoring fouling during ultrafiltration of WWTP effluent.
    Roorda JH; van der Graaf JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(10):241-8. PubMed ID: 11436787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of skim milk treated with high hydrostatic pressure on permeate flux and fouling during ultrafiltration.
    Leu M; Marciniak A; Chamberland J; Pouliot Y; Bazinet L; Doyen A
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Sep; 100(9):7071-7082. PubMed ID: 28647330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of filtration mode and backwash water on hydraulically irreversible fouling of ultrafiltration membrane.
    Chang H; Liu B; Liang H; Yu H; Shao S; Li G
    Chemosphere; 2017 Jul; 179():254-264. PubMed ID: 28371709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of ultra- and microfiltration in the presence and absence of secondary flow with polysaccharides, proteins, and yeast suspensions.
    Gehlert G; Luque S; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Prog; 1998; 14(6):931-42. PubMed ID: 9841658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fouling Mechanisms Analysis via Combined Fouling Models for Surface Water Ultrafiltration Process.
    Huang B; Gu H; Xiao K; Qu F; Yu H; Wei C
    Membranes (Basel); 2020 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 32664301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM).
    Lee N; Amy G; Croué JP; Buisson H
    Water Res; 2004 Dec; 38(20):4511-23. PubMed ID: 15556226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the role of feed water constituents in irreversible membrane fouling of pilot-scale ultrafiltration drinking water treatment systems.
    Peiris RH; Jaklewicz M; Budman H; Legge RL; Moresoli C
    Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3364-74. PubMed ID: 23615336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) removal efficiency by a combination of coagulation and ultrafiltration to minimize SWRO membrane fouling.
    Li S; Lee ST; Sinha S; Leiknes T; Amy GL; Ghaffour N
    Water Res; 2016 Oct; 102():485-493. PubMed ID: 27403871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Fouling Comparison Study of Algal, Bacterial and Humic Organic Matters in Seawater Desalination Pretreatment Using Ceramic UF Membranes.
    Al Namazi M; Li S; Ghaffour N; Leiknes T; Amy G
    Membranes (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36837737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preparation of milk protein concentrates by ultrafiltration and continuous diafiltration: Effect of process design on overall efficiency.
    Gavazzi-April C; Benoit S; Doyen A; Britten M; Pouliot Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Nov; 101(11):9670-9679. PubMed ID: 30172402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Membrane foulants and fouling mechanisms in microfiltration and ultrafiltration of an activated sludge effluent.
    Nguyen ST; Roddick FA; Harris JL
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):1975-83. PubMed ID: 21045321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kinetics of Permeate Flux Decline in Crossflow Membrane Filtration of Colloidal Suspensions.
    Hong S; Faibish RS; Elimelech M
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1997 Dec; 196(2):267-277. PubMed ID: 9792752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-performance thin-layer hydrogel composite membranes for ultrafiltration of natural organic matter.
    Susanto H; Ulbricht M
    Water Res; 2008 May; 42(10-11):2827-35. PubMed ID: 18342907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microcystis aeruginosa-laden surface water treatment using ultrafiltration: Membrane fouling, cell integrity and extracellular organic matter rejection.
    Liu B; Qu F; Liang H; Van der Bruggen B; Cheng X; Yu H; Xu G; Li G
    Water Res; 2017 Apr; 112():83-92. PubMed ID: 28142092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The substitution of sand filtration by immersed-UF for surface water treatment: pilot-scale studies.
    Lihua S; Xing L; Guoyu Z; Jie C; Zhe X; Guibai L
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(9):2337-43. PubMed ID: 19901465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A crossflow filtration system for constant permeate flux membrane fouling characterization.
    Miller DJ; Paul DR; Freeman BD
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2013 Mar; 84(3):035003. PubMed ID: 23556842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.