These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12785066)

  • 21. A sensory origin for color-word stroop effects in aging: simulating age-related changes in color-vision mimics age-related changes in Stroop.
    Ben-David BM; Schneider BA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2010 Nov; 17(6):730-46. PubMed ID: 21058053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Word reading practice reduces Stroop interference in children.
    Protopapas A; Vlahou EL; Moirou D; Ziaka L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():204-8. PubMed ID: 24607439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion.
    Dhooge E; Hartsuiker RJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):878-91. PubMed ID: 20565207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ADHD and Stroop interference from age 9 to age 41 years: a meta-analysis of developmental effects.
    Schwartz K; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Med; 2008 Nov; 38(11):1607-16. PubMed ID: 18226285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
    Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stroop-like serial position effects in color naming of words and nonwords.
    Marmurek HH; Proctor C; Javor A
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 16909934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cross-modal interference-control is reduced in childhood but maintained in aging: A cohort study of stimulus- and response-interference in cross-modal and unimodal Stroop tasks.
    Hirst RJ; Kicks EC; Allen HA; Cragg L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):553-572. PubMed ID: 30945905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Object-based attentional selection can modulate the Stroop effect.
    Wühr P; Waszak F
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Sep; 31(6):983-94. PubMed ID: 14651304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stroop dilution but not word-processing dilution: evidence for attention capture.
    Mitterer H; La Heij W; Van der Heijden AH
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 12589448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stroop/reverse-Stroop interference in typical development and its relation to symptoms of ADHD.
    Ikeda Y; Okuzumi H; Kokubun M
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Aug; 34(8):2391-8. PubMed ID: 23714715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Coloring an action: intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect.
    Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 2004 Apr; 68(2-3):74-90. PubMed ID: 14634808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Role of Gestalt grouping in selective attention: evidence from the Stroop task.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Nov; 69(8):1305-14. PubMed ID: 18078222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Examining the time course of prime effects on Stroop processing.
    Koch C; Brown JM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Aug; 79(1 Pt 2):675-87. PubMed ID: 7808909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spatial Integration and the Underlying Mechanisms of Cross-Modality Interference.
    Lutfi-Proctor DA; Elliott EM; Golob EJ
    J Cogn; 2018 Jan; 2(1):2. PubMed ID: 31517222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Goal-neglect links Stroop interference with working memory capacity.
    Morey CC; Elliott EM; Wiggers J; Eaves SD; Shelton JT; Mall JT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 22749714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies.
    Taylor SF; Kornblum S; Lauber EJ; Minoshima S; Koeppe RA
    Neuroimage; 1997 Aug; 6(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 9299382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An optimal viewing position effect in the Stroop task when only one letter is the color carrier.
    Parris BA; Sharma D; Weekes B
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 17953147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distractibility and processing resource deficit in major depression. Evidence for two deficient attentional processing models.
    Lemelin S; Baruch P; Vincent A; Everett J; Vincent P
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1997 Sep; 185(9):542-8. PubMed ID: 9307615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.