These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12785662)

  • 1. Effects of sex on raters' accountability.
    Shore TH; Tashchian A
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Apr; 92(2):693-702. PubMed ID: 12785662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An examination of raters' and ratees' preferences in process and feedback in performance appraisal.
    Manshor AT; Kamalanabhan TJ
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Feb; 86(1):203-14. PubMed ID: 10778271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of feedback accountability and self-rating information on employee appraisals: a replication and extension.
    Shore TH; Tashchian A
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Jun; 100(3 Pt 2):1091-100. PubMed ID: 17886493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Liking and attributions of motives as mediators of the relationships between individuals' reputations, helpful behaviors, and raters' reward decisions.
    Johnson DE; Erez A; Kiker DS; Motowidlo SJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Aug; 87(4):808-15. PubMed ID: 12184583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increasing performance appraisal effectiveness: matching task types, appraisal process, and rater training.
    Lee C
    Acad Manage Rev; 1985 Apr; 10(2):322-31. PubMed ID: 10271248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The roles of rater goals and ratee performance levels in the distortion of performance ratings.
    Wang XM; Wong KF; Kwong JY
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 May; 95(3):546-61. PubMed ID: 20476832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Source-monitoring training: toward reducing rater expectancy effects in behavioral measurement.
    Martell RF; Evans DP
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Sep; 90(5):956-63. PubMed ID: 16162067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cultural values and performance appraisal: assessing the effects of rater self-construal on performance ratings.
    Mishra V; Roch SG
    J Psychol; 2013; 147(4):325-44. PubMed ID: 23885636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frame-of-reference training and cognitive categorization: an empirical investigation of rater memory issues.
    Sulsky LM; Day DV
    J Appl Psychol; 1992 Aug; 77(4):501-10. PubMed ID: 1512184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Race of ratee and anonymity of rater: a study comparing students with practitioners as performance appraisers.
    Beaulieu RP
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Oct; 97(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 16342570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings: testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism-collectivism.
    Ng KY; Koh C; Ang S; Kennedy JC; Chan KY
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):1033-44. PubMed ID: 21480684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings.
    Scullen SE; Mount MK; Goff M
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Dec; 85(6):956-70. PubMed ID: 11125659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can two psychotherapy process measures be dependably rated simultaneously? A generalizability study.
    Ulvenes PG; Berggraf L; Hoffart A; Levy RA; Ablon JS; McCullough L; Wampold BE
    J Couns Psychol; 2012 Oct; 59(4):638-44. PubMed ID: 23088686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rater-based assessments as social judgments: rethinking the etiology of rater errors.
    Gingerich A; Regehr G; Eva KW
    Acad Med; 2011 Oct; 86(10 Suppl):S1-7. PubMed ID: 21955759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The implications of unconfounding multisource performance ratings.
    Jackson DJR; Michaelides G; Dewberry C; Schwencke B; Toms S
    J Appl Psychol; 2020 Mar; 105(3):312-329. PubMed ID: 31328925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of group discussion on performance judgments: rating accuracy, contrast effects, and halo.
    Palmer JK; Loveland JM
    J Psychol; 2008 Mar; 142(2):117-30. PubMed ID: 18447070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Cognitive Evaluation of Frame-of-Reference Rater Training: Content and Process Issues.
    Schleicher DJ; Day DV
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1998 Jan; 73(1):76-101. PubMed ID: 9705795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Site versus centralized raters in a clinical depression trial: impact on patient selection and placebo response.
    Kobak KA; Leuchter A; DeBrota D; Engelhardt N; Williams JB; Cook IA; Leon AC; Alpert J
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2010 Apr; 30(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 20520295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On individual differences in person perception: raters' personality traits relate to their psychopathy checklist-revised scoring tendencies.
    Miller AK; Rufino KA; Boccaccini MT; Jackson RL; Murrie DC
    Assessment; 2011 Jun; 18(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 21393315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informational advantages in social networks: The core-periphery divide in peer performance ratings.
    Zhao HH; Li N; Harris TB; Rosen CC; Zhang X
    J Appl Psychol; 2021 Jul; 106(7):1093-1102. PubMed ID: 32852987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.