These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12785662)

  • 21. Cloze analysis in schizophrenic speech: scoring method and raters' education.
    Maher BA; Manschreck TC; Weisstein CC; Schneyer ML; Okunieff R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Dec; 67(3):911-8. PubMed ID: 3226847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A novel approach to rater training and certification in multinational trials.
    Jeglic E; Kobak KA; Engelhardt N; Williams JB; Lipsitz JD; Salvucci D; Bryson H; Bellew K
    Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 2007 Jul; 22(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 17519640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multi-faceted Rasch measurement and bias patterns in EFL writing performance assessment.
    He TH; Gou WJ; Chien YC; Chen IS; Chang SM
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Apr; 112(2):469-85. PubMed ID: 23833876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Workplace-based assessment: raters' performance theories and constructs.
    Govaerts MJ; Van de Wiel MW; Schuwirth LW; Van der Vleuten CP; Muijtjens AM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Aug; 18(3):375-96. PubMed ID: 22592323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cross-national differences in the assessment of psychopathy: do they reflect variations in raters' perceptions of symptoms?
    Cooke DJ; Hart SD; Michie C
    Psychol Assess; 2004 Sep; 16(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 15456390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: a policy-capturing approach.
    Rotundo M
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Feb; 87(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 11916217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Team assessment utilizing a many-facet Rasch model.
    Allen JM; Schumacker RE
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):142-58. PubMed ID: 9661736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using frame-of-reference training to understand the implications of rater idiosyncrasy for rating accuracy.
    Uggerslev KL; Sulsky LM
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 May; 93(3):711-9. PubMed ID: 18457499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Rater Applied Performance Scale: development and reliability.
    Lipsitz J; Kobak K; Feiger A; Sikich D; Moroz G; Engelhard A
    Psychiatry Res; 2004 Jun; 127(1-2):147-55. PubMed ID: 15261713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Examination of Performance Appraisal Behavior Structure.
    Tziner A; Levy S
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():2075. PubMed ID: 28119659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The meaning and suitability of various effect sizes for structured Rater x Ratee designs.
    Hönekopp J; Becker BJ; Oswald FL
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 16594768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Twins Assessing Their Own and Parental Intelligence: Examining the Raters' Agreement and the Effect of Raters' and Targets' Gender.
    Bratko D; Pocrnić M; Butković A
    Eur J Psychol; 2020 May; 16(2):229-248. PubMed ID: 33680180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable?
    Facteau JD; Craig SB
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Apr; 86(2):215-27. PubMed ID: 11393435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students.
    Lurie SJ; Nofziger AC; Meldrum S; Mooney C; Epstein RM
    Med Educ; 2006 Nov; 40(11):1088-97. PubMed ID: 17054618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An empirical examination of sex differences in scoring preschool children's aggression.
    Pellegrini AD; Bohn-Gettler CM; Dupuis D; Hickey M; Roseth C; Solberg D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Jun; 109(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 21147486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain: The overlooked issue of rater selection in psychotherapy observer ratings.
    Ezawa ID; Bartels GC; Pfeifer BJ; Strunk DR
    Psychother Res; 2021 Apr; 31(4):548-556. PubMed ID: 32552478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. User perceptions of multi-source feedback tools for junior doctors.
    Burford B; Illing J; Kergon C; Morrow G; Livingston M
    Med Educ; 2010 Feb; 44(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 20059677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences in inter-rater reliability and accuracy for a treatment adherence scale.
    Wu SM; Whiteside U; Neighbors C
    Cogn Behav Ther; 2007; 36(4):230-9. PubMed ID: 18049948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the influence of rater and subject characteristics on measures of agreement for ordinal ratings.
    Nelson KP; Mitani AA; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(20):3181-3199. PubMed ID: 28612356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reducing the Effects of Performance Expectations on Behavioral Ratings.
    Baltes BB; Parker CP
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Jul; 82(2):237-267. PubMed ID: 10891297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.