These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1278621)

  • 1. The English law of libel and medical journals.
    Sieghart P
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 1976 Feb; 18(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 1278621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How English libel law has a global chill on free speech.
    Singh S
    Cortex; 2011 Jun; 47(6):643-4. PubMed ID: 21458790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Libel damages against "World Medicine".
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1981 Apr; 282(6273):1403. PubMed ID: 6786526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Texas judge throws out Wakefield's libel action against BMJ.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2012 Aug; 345():e5328. PubMed ID: 22867918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attempting to demystify law reports for the non-lawyer.
    Fletcher VA
    J Med Ethics; 1988 Mar; 14(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 3351882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Public psychiatry and Presidential libel.
    Curran WJ
    Am J Public Health Nations Health; 1969 Dec; 59(12):2269-71. PubMed ID: 5389510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. End of dentist's libel action. Some legal implications of the Drummond-Jackson action.
    Br Med J; 1972 Nov; 4(5836):372-4. PubMed ID: 4637539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentist's libel action continues.
    Br Med J; 1972 Jul; 3(5819):184-6. PubMed ID: 5039798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. BMJ invokes new Texan freedom of speech law to fight Wakefield libel case.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e2051. PubMed ID: 22419791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An old battle: England's libel laws versus scientific debate.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 2010 Mar; 340():c1227. PubMed ID: 20219790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Libel and slander, the physician and the law.
    FRIEDMAN GA
    Med Times; 1956 Oct; 84(10):1115-21. PubMed ID: 13368877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thomas Wakley, plagiarism, libel, and the founding of The Lancet.
    Jones R
    Lancet; 2008 Apr; 371(9622):1410-1. PubMed ID: 18446926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethics and law.
    Ravindran GD
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2010; 7(4):263. PubMed ID: 22106584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Science and the libel court.
    Robb D
    Anesth Analg; 1973; 52(6):1011-3. PubMed ID: 4796556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Doctor's action for libel in high court to be heard before GMC proceedings relating to the same matters.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1984 Nov; 2(8410):1050-1. PubMed ID: 6149438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Doctor's libel action against the BBC.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1985 May; 1(8438):1171. PubMed ID: 2860382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the GMC guidance on confidentiality compatible with English law?
    Tamin J
    Occup Med (Lond); 2015 Jun; 65(4):266-7. PubMed ID: 25972606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SAY IT SAFELY: DENTISTRY AND THE LAW OF LIBEL.
    JOHNSTON WS
    J Calif Dent Assoc (1961); 1965 Apr; 41():109-13. PubMed ID: 14278154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dentist's libel action continues.
    Br Med J; 1972 Nov; 4(5835):308-11. PubMed ID: 5083909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Legal discussions in medical literature: is there adequate peer review?
    Kapp MB
    Med Law; 1988; 7(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 3210912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.