BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12786947)

  • 1. Masseter thickness, endurance and exercise-induced pain in subjects with different vertical craniofacial morphology.
    Farella M; Bakke M; Michelotti A; Rapuano A; Martina R
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2003 Jun; 111(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 12786947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Masseter muscle thickness and mechanical advantage in relation to vertical craniofacial morphology in children.
    Charalampidou M; Kjellberg H; Georgiakaki I; Kiliaridis S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Feb; 66(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18320415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors.
    Bakke M; Tuxen A; Vilmann P; Jensen BR; Vilmann A; Toft M
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Jun; 100(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 1631486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationships between craniofacial morphology and masticatory muscle activity during isometric contraction at different interocclusal distances.
    Takeuchi-Sato T; Arima T; Mew M; Svensson P
    Arch Oral Biol; 2019 Feb; 98():52-60. PubMed ID: 30448395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasonographic assessment of the swelling of the human masseter muscle after static and dynamic activity.
    Bakke M; Thomsen CE; Vilmann A; Soneda K; Farella M; Møller E
    Arch Oral Biol; 1996 Feb; 41(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 8712969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Masseter muscle thickness in different skeletal morphology: an ultrasonographic study.
    Rani S; Ravi MS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 20930353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variables related to masseter muscle function: a maximum R2 improvement analysis.
    Bakke M; Stoltze K; Tuxen A
    Scand J Dent Res; 1993 Jun; 101(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 8322010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between masseter muscle thickness and maxillofacial morphology in pre-orthodontic treatment patients.
    Soyoye OA; Otuyemi OD; Kolawole KA; Ayoola OO
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):698-711. PubMed ID: 30348502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Facial morphology and the size and activity of the masseter muscle].
    Ruf S; Pancherz H; Kirschbaum M
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1994 Oct; 55(5):219-27. PubMed ID: 7995603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Habitual daily masseter activity of subjects with different vertical craniofacial morphology.
    Farella M; Michelotti A; Carbone G; Gallo LM; Palla S; Martina R
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Oct; 113(5):380-5. PubMed ID: 16202024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
    Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Study on the association of ultrasonographic thickness and electromyographic activity of masseter muscle in young females with different vertical craniofacial morphology.
    Li HT; Cui CJ; Lu SL; He KY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Oct; 17(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 18989598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional evaluation of masseter muscle in different vertical facial patterns: a cross-sectional study in growing children.
    Lione R; Franchi L; Noviello A; Bollero P; Fanucci E; Cozza P
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Oct; 35(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 24081727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude.
    Raadsheer MC; van Eijden TM; van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jan; 78(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 10065943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of masseter muscle in different vertical skeletal patterns in growing patients.
    Biondi K; Lorusso P; Fastuca R; Mangano A; Zecca PA; Bosco M; Caprioglio A; Levrini L
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Mar; 17(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 26949239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maxillofacial morphology and masseter muscle thickness in adults.
    Kubota M; Nakano H; Sanjo I; Satoh K; Sanjo T; Kamegai T; Ishikawa F
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):535-42. PubMed ID: 9825556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Masseter muscle thickness in growing individuals and its relation to facial morphology.
    Raadsheer MC; Kiliaridis S; Van Eijden TM; Van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
    Arch Oral Biol; 1996 Apr; 41(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 8771323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between masseter muscle size and maxillary morphology.
    Uchida Y; Motoyoshi M; Shigeeda T; Shinohara A; Igarashi Y; Sakaguchi M; Shimizu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):654-9. PubMed ID: 21262936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental noxious stimulation of the right masseter muscle does not affect bilateral masseter and temporalis muscle activity and force parameters during standardised isometric biting tasks.
    Sandoval I; Moura Ferreira P; Obregon F; Whittle T; Murray GM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Nov; 45(11):871-880. PubMed ID: 30024046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The sufficiency of blood flow in human masseter muscle during endurance of biting in the intercuspal position and on a force transducer.
    Monteiro AA; Kopp S
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1989; 85(4-5):261-72. PubMed ID: 2635778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.