These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12787182)

  • 1. Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences.
    Eakin JM; Mykhalovskiy E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2003 May; 9(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 12787182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review.
    Twaij H; Oussedik S; Hoffmeyer P
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Apr; 96-B(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 24692607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating and synthesizing qualitative research: the need to develop a distinctive approach.
    Barbour RS; Barbour M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2003 May; 9(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 12787181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incorporating qualitative evidence in clinical practice guidelines: a Scottish perspective.
    Cooper K; Kirkpatrick P; Florida-James S
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2019 Jun; 17 Suppl 1():S6-S8. PubMed ID: 31283568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine and women: do the principles and practice of EBM further women's health?
    Rogers W
    Bioethics; 2004; 18(1):50-71. PubMed ID: 15168698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attempting to use a Cochrane review: experience of three occupational therapists.
    Gervais IS; Poirier A; Van Iterson L; Egan M
    Am J Occup Ther; 2002; 56(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 11833396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The risk of bias from omitted research.
    Garattini S; Liberati A
    BMJ; 2000 Oct; 321(7265):845-6. PubMed ID: 11021845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconceptualizing qualitative evidence.
    Morse JM
    Qual Health Res; 2006 Mar; 16(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 16449690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The international EQUATOR network: enhancing the quality and transparency of health care research.
    Pandis N; Fedorowicz Z
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Oct; 19(5):0. PubMed ID: 21986662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research.
    Daly J; Willis K; Small R; Green J; Welch N; Kealy M; Hughes E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 60(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 17161753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evidence-based medicine in the real world--an experimental evaluation in a hospital care system].
    Zielinski W; Goldstein M; Müller-Lissner S
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2003 Jul; 97(4-5):277-82. PubMed ID: 12891969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The need to act a little more 'scientific': biomedical researchers investigating complementary and alternative medicine.
    Polich G; Dole C; Kaptchuk TJ
    Sociol Health Illn; 2010 Jan; 32(1):106-22. PubMed ID: 19891621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Desperately seeking dissonance: identifying the disconfirming case in qualitative evidence synthesis.
    Booth A; Carroll C; Ilott I; Low LL; Cooper K
    Qual Health Res; 2013 Jan; 23(1):126-41. PubMed ID: 23166156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back.
    Pronovost P; Wachter R
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2006 Jun; 15(3):152-3. PubMed ID: 16751460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields.
    Elliott R; Fischer CT; Rennie DL
    Br J Clin Psychol; 1999 Sep; 38(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 10532145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic reviews and cancer research: a suggested stepwise approach.
    Kelley GA; Kelley KS
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):246. PubMed ID: 29499652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the effectiveness of a practical inquiry-based learning bioinformatics module on undergraduate student engagement and applied skills.
    Brown JA
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2016 May; 44(3):304-13. PubMed ID: 27161812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health care policy: qualitative evidence and health technology assessment.
    Leys M
    Health Policy; 2003 Sep; 65(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 12941490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Appraising Qualitative Research for Evidence Syntheses: A Compendium of Quality Appraisal Tools.
    Majid U; Vanstone M
    Qual Health Res; 2018 Nov; 28(13):2115-2131. PubMed ID: 30047306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.