These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12787189)

  • 1. The Australian Centre for Evidence-based Clinical Practice generic audit tool: Auditmaker for health professionals.
    Shakib S; Phillips PA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2003 May; 9(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 12787189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Arthritis quality indicators for the Veterans Administration: implications for electronic data collection, storage format, quality assessment, and clinical decision support.
    Williams CA; Mosley-Williams AD; Overhage JM
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; 2007():806-10. PubMed ID: 18693948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are audits wasting resources by measuring the wrong things? A survey of methods used to select audit review criteria.
    Hearnshaw HM; Harker RM; Cheater FM; Baker RH; Grimshaw GM
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2003 Feb; 12(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 12571341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using perinatal audit to promote change: a review.
    Mancey-Jones M; Brugha RF
    Health Policy Plan; 1997 Sep; 12(3):183-92. PubMed ID: 10173399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Desiderata for a computer-assisted audit tool for clinical data source verification audits.
    Duda SN; Wehbe FH; Gadd CS
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 2):894-8. PubMed ID: 20841814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinician friendly computerised head and neck oncology audit: the first year results.
    Rogers SN; Beirne JC; Patel M; Vaughan ED; Brown JS
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1996 Jan; 78(1 Suppl):14-8. PubMed ID: 8659993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-based surgical audit programs: a review of three current options.
    Colledge DN; White S
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1997 Apr; 67(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 9137162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acquisition and use of clinical data for audit and research.
    Wyatt J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Sep; 1(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 9238554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ADIPS pilot National Diabetes in Pregnancy Audit Project.
    Simmons D; Cheung NW; McIntyre HD; Flack JR; Lagstrom J; Bond D; Johnson E; Wolmarans L; Wein P; Sinha AK;
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Jun; 47(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 17550486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ABC of medical computing. Using computers in clinical audit.
    Kinn S; Lee N; Millman A
    BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7007):739-42. PubMed ID: 7549693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An electronic medical record system with direct data-entry and research capabilities.
    Salenius SA; Margolese-Malin L; Tepper JE; Rosenman J; Varia M; Hodge L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1992; 24(2):369-76. PubMed ID: 1526876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Piloting online self-audit of methadone treatment in Irish general practice: results, reflections and educational outcomes.
    Van Hout MC; Crowley D; McBride A; Delargy I
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 18(1):153. PubMed ID: 29945578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. COCPIT: a tool for integrated care pathway variance analysis.
    Ainsworth J; Buchan I
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():995-9. PubMed ID: 22874343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of database systems in diabetes care.
    Kopelman PG; Sanderson AJ
    Med Inform (Lond); 1996; 21(4):259-71. PubMed ID: 9244825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Successful implementation of diabetes audits in Australia: the Australian National Diabetes Information Audit and Benchmarking (ANDIAB) initiative.
    Lee AS; Colagiuri S; Flack JR
    Diabet Med; 2018 Jul; 35(7):929-936. PubMed ID: 29633347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeated measurements of generic indicators: a Danish national program to benchmark and improve quality of care.
    Qvist P; Rasmussen L; Bonnevie B; Gjørup T
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2004 Apr; 16(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 15051708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality improvement in New Zealand healthcare. Part 3: achieving effective care through clinical audit.
    Seddon M; Buchanan J;
    N Z Med J; 2006 Aug; 119(1239):U2108. PubMed ID: 16912726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire as a teaching and comparative audit tool.
    Steven ID
    Qual Assur Health Care; 1991; 3(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 1873529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audits, errors and the misplace of clinical indicators: revisiting the Quality in Australian Health Care Study.
    Siddins M
    ANZ J Surg; 2002 Nov; 72(11):832-4. PubMed ID: 12437696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Routinely-collected general practice data are complex, but with systematic processing can be used for quality improvement and research.
    de Lusignan S; Hague N; van Vlymen J; Kumarapeli P
    Inform Prim Care; 2006; 14(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 16848968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.