These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12787458)

  • 1. Visual observation of the dynamic flow of elastomer rubber impression material between the impression tray and oral mucosa while seating the impression tray.
    Nishigawa G; Natsuaki N; Maruo Y; Okamoto M; Minagi S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 30(6):608-13. PubMed ID: 12787458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of tray adhesives for the adhesion of elastomer rubber impression materials to impression modeling plastics for border molding.
    Nishigawa G; Sato T; Suenaga K; Minagi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 9513098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of relief space and escape holes on pressure characteristics of maxillary edentulous impressions.
    Komiyama O; Saeki H; Kawara M; Kobayashi K; Otake S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):570-6. PubMed ID: 15211300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dimensional changes and pressure of dental stones set in silicone rubber impressions.
    Teraoka F; Takahashi J
    Dent Mater; 2000 Mar; 16(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 11203536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vivo investigation of seating and removal forces associated with recording impressions in dentate patients.
    Sotiriou M; Hobkirk JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):455-62. PubMed ID: 8809249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New theoretical model to measure pressure produced during impression procedure for complete dentures-Visual inspection of impression material flow.
    Nishigawa G; Maruo Y; Irie M; Oka M; Tamada Y; Minagi S
    Dent Mater; 2013 May; 29(5):530-4. PubMed ID: 23477950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bond strength of two nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials bonded to two thermoplastic resin tray materials.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 8778378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The bonding properties of various silicone impression materials at standardized surfaces using adhesives].
    Morneburg T
    Dtsch Stomatol (1990); 1991; 41(8):306-8. PubMed ID: 1816858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A laboratory study of dimensional changes for three elastomeric impression materials using custom and stock trays.
    Boulton JL; Gage JP; Vincent PF; Basford KE
    Aust Dent J; 1996 Dec; 41(6):398-404. PubMed ID: 9008997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of operator variability on void formation in impressions made with an automixed addition silicone.
    Lim KC; Chong YH; Soh G
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 1567292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The bond strength of elastomer tray adhesives to thermoplastic and acrylic resin tray materials.
    Hogans WR; Agar JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Apr; 67(4):541-3. PubMed ID: 1507140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adhesion of elastomeric impression materials to trays.
    Bindra B; Heath JR
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 9049922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vertical distortion in distal extension ridges and palatal area of casts made by different techniques.
    Wang HY; Lu YC; Shiau YY; Tsou D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Mar; 75(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 8648579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of elastomeric impression materials used in fixed prosthodontics.
    Ciesco JN; Malone WF; Sandrik JL; Mazur B
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jan; 45(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7007629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impression tray--an important factor in impression precision.
    Rehberg HJ
    Int Dent J; 1977 Jun; 27(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 328405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.