BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12787813)

  • 1. How many high production chemicals are rodent carcinogens? Why should we care? What do we need to do about it?
    Johnson FM
    Mutat Res; 2003 Jun; 543(3):201-15. PubMed ID: 12787813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the utility of the lifetime mouse bioassay in the identification of cancer hazards for humans.
    Osimitz TG; Droege W; Boobis AR; Lake BG
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2013 Oct; 60():550-62. PubMed ID: 23954551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transformation of BALB/c-3T3 cells: V. Transformation responses of 168 chemicals compared with mutagenicity in Salmonella and carcinogenicity in rodent bioassays.
    Matthews EJ; Spalding JW; Tennant RW
    Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Jul; 101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):347-482. PubMed ID: 8243403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alternatives to the 2-species bioassay for the identification of potential human carcinogens.
    Ashby J
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1996 Mar; 15(3):183-202. PubMed ID: 8839204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. ICPEMC Working Paper 1/2. A multi-factor ranking scheme for comparing the carcinogenic activity of chemicals.
    Nesnow S
    Mutat Res; 1990 Sep; 239(2):83-115. PubMed ID: 2385240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of chemical structure on the extent and sites of carcinogenesis for 522 rodent carcinogens and 55 different human carcinogen exposures.
    Ashby J; Paton D
    Mutat Res; 1993 Mar; 286(1):3-74. PubMed ID: 7678908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How many food additives are rodent carcinogens?
    Johnson FM
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2002; 39(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 11813298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice.
    Battershill JM; Fielder RJ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Opportunities for an alternative integrating testing strategy for carcinogen hazard assessment?
    Doktorova TY; Pauwels M; Vinken M; Vanhaecke T; Rogiers V
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2012 Feb; 42(2):91-106. PubMed ID: 22141324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Further evaluation of COMPACT, the molecular orbital approach for the prospective safety evaluation of chemicals.
    Lewis DF; Ioannides C; Parke DV
    Mutat Res; 1998 Jan; 412(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 9508363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity for 44 chemicals: results.
    Ashby J; Tennant RW
    Mutagenesis; 1994 Jan; 9(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 8208133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. QSARS of mutagens and carcinogens: two case studies illustrating problems in the construction of models for noncongeneric chemicals.
    Benigni R; Richard AM
    Mutat Res; 1996 Nov; 371(1-2):29-46. PubMed ID: 8950348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of carcinogenicity from two versus four sex-species groups in the carcinogenic potency database.
    Gold LS; Slone TH
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1993 May; 39(1):143-57. PubMed ID: 8492327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hydroquinone: an evaluation of the human risks from its carcinogenic and mutagenic properties.
    McGregor D
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007; 37(10):887-914. PubMed ID: 18027166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
    Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental pollution, pesticides, and the prevention of cancer: misconceptions.
    Ames BN; Gold LS
    FASEB J; 1997 Nov; 11(13):1041-52. PubMed ID: 9367339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.